Page images
PDF
EPUB

Opinion Per Curiam.

THE STATE, Ex rel. Woolery et al., v. Brenner

ET AL.

Constitutional law-Joint county tuberculosis hospitals.

(No. 15389-Decided May 29, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

Mr. J. A. Kerr and Mr. Joseph W. Sharts, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. D. W. Iddings; Mr. R. C. Patterson; Mr. P. A. Saylor and Mr. Robert R. Nevin, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of Brissel et al., Commissioners, v. State, ex rel. McCammon, 87 Ohio St., 154.

Judgment affirmed.

WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

HAYES V. THE HOCKING VALLEY RAILWAY CO.

Supreme court — Dismissals—No constitutional question involved.

[blocks in formation]

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.

Opinion Per Curiam.

Mr. B. A. Hayes and Mr. C. A. Seiders, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Brown, Geddes, Schmettau & Williams, and Messrs. Wilson & Rector, for defendant in

error.

Dismissed on ground that no constitutional question is involved.

Dismissed.

NICHOLS, C. J., NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

HOLLOWELL, EXRX., v. SCHRADEN.

Court of appeals - Jurisdiction on appeal - Chancery cases — Mechanics' liens.

(No. 15491-Decided June 26, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Butler county.

Mr. Michael Minges and Messrs. Andrews & Andrews, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Clinton Egbert and Mr. E. A. Belden, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed on the authority of Wagner v. Armstrong et al., 93 Ohio St., 443, and this cause is remanded to the court of appeals with in

Opinion Per Curiam.

structions to overrule the motion on file therein to dismiss the appeal of Eliza Ann Hollowell, executrix of the last will and testament of Francis M. Hollowell, deceased, from the court of common pleas.

Judgment reversed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, Newman, Jones, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

KAMMANN ET AL. V. KAMMANN ET AL.

Supreme court

Dismissals No constitutional question involved. (No. 15499 Decided June 26, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Messrs. Lorbach & Garver and Messrs. Herrlinger & Dixon, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Wm. Jerome Kuertz and Messrs. Kinkead & Rogers, for defendants in error.

Dismissed on ground that no constitutional question is involved.

Dismissed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

Opinion Per Curiam.

RIGOT V. THE CITY OF EAST LIVERPOOL.

Intoxicating liquors — Conviction and fine for unlawful sale – Commitment to workhouse pending payment-Right to jury trial - Jurisdiction of mayor.

(No. 15524-Decided June 26, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Columbiana county.

Mr. W. F. Lones and Mr. J. C. Hanley, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R. G. Thompson, city solicitor, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of State, ex rel. Smith, v. Smith, 69 Ohio St., 196.

Judgment affirmed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, Newman, Jones, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

THE STATE, EX REL. B. & O. S. W. RD. Co., v. KELLEY, JUDGE.

Writ of prohibition-Purpose and scope-Jurisdiction of Cincinnati insolvency court-In action for damages for change of street grade in constructing viaduct.

(No. 15632 — Decided June 26, 1917.)

IN PROHIBITION.

Opinion Per Curiam.

Messrs. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, for relator.

Mr. Otto Pfleger and Mr. Smith Hickenlooper, assistant prosecuting attorney, for respondent.

Writ denied on authority of The State, ex rel. Garrison, v. Brough et al., 94 Ohio St., 115.

Writ denied.

WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

THE CINCINNATI TRACTION CO. ET AL. V. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI.

Supreme court - Dismissals-No constitutional question involved — Appellate jurisdiction of court of appeals.

(No. 15509 Decided July 3, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Mr. Joseph Wilby and Mr. Ellis G. Kinkead, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Charles A. Groom, city solicitor, and Mr. Constant Southworth, assistant city solicitor, for defendant in error.

Petition dismissed for the following reasons: 1st. The record does not present any constitu

« PreviousContinue »