...or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify, others may employ with equal...have an equal right to employ, for the same purpose. Were such an appropriation to be sanctioned by an injunction, the action of a court of equity would...

...as a trade mark, a sign or symbol, which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to represent, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore...have an equal right to employ, for the same purpose. Farina v. Silvcrlock, 39 Eng. Law and Eq. 514, and Amoskeag Manufac. Co. v. Spear, supra. If those...

...ownership of the goods, and are only meant to indicate their quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is meant to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for...

...which, from the nature of the fact which it is used ' to signify, others may employ with equal trath, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose." This is one of the positions laid down hy DUER, J., in the elahorate opinion in Amoskcag Manufacturing...

...wrongs by which the patrons are unwittingly deviated. The complainant has 110 right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is m .ant to signify, others may emyloy with equal truth for the same purpose. 2 Sumlf. R., 599. Names...

...Daly, 7 Bosw. 222 ; Binninger v. Wattles, 28 How. Pr. 206. A party cannot appropriate as a trademark a sign or symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is intended to represent, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ...

...goods, but are only meant to indicate their names or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used...have an equal right to employ for the same purpose."* And it is obvious that the same reasons which forbid the exclusive appropriation of generic names or...

...name or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify others may employ with equal...an equal right to employ for the same purpose. It will be seen from the foregoing extracts that a party has the right to be protected in the use of a...

...goods, but are only meant to indicate their names or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used...have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. Vide Wolfe v. Goulard, 18 Howard's Practice Reports, 64; Fctridgev. Wells, 4 Abbott's Practice Reports,...

...letters, figures, or symbols which, from the nature of the fact they were used to signify, others might employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. (Amoskeag Co. vs. Spear, 2 Saudford's Supreme Court, 599 ; Canal Company vs. Clark, 13 Wallace, 311,...