Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 196West Publishing Company, 1961 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 71
Page 128
... examination or in- vestigation was not shown to be unneces- sary , and summonses did not call for tax- payers ' books of account . 26 U.S.C.A. ( I.R.C.1954 ) ยง 7605 ( b ) . On Motion for Reargument 3. Internal Revenue 1455 That ...
... examination or in- vestigation was not shown to be unneces- sary , and summonses did not call for tax- payers ' books of account . 26 U.S.C.A. ( I.R.C.1954 ) ยง 7605 ( b ) . On Motion for Reargument 3. Internal Revenue 1455 That ...
Page 129
... examination or in- vestigations " on the one hand and " in- spection of a taxpayer's books of ac- count " on the other . I thus need not consider the taxpayers ' hotly contested position that the investi- gation has not been continuous ...
... examination or in- vestigations " on the one hand and " in- spection of a taxpayer's books of ac- count " on the other . I thus need not consider the taxpayers ' hotly contested position that the investi- gation has not been continuous ...
Page 274
... examination by smell was made of the post - seizure samples selected by the Food and Drug Administration by ... examination of food products , especially frozen fish fil- lets . 11. On March 15 and 16 , 1961 or- ganoleptic examination by ...
... examination by smell was made of the post - seizure samples selected by the Food and Drug Administration by ... examination of food products , especially frozen fish fil- lets . 11. On March 15 and 16 , 1961 or- ganoleptic examination by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Admiralty alleged amended American amount application attorney automobile barite Board cause Chief Judge Cite as 196 Civil Procedure claim claimant Class 3 fillets Company complaint contract corporation counsel counts damages decision declaratory judgment defendant defendant's denied disability District Court District Judge employees entitled evidence F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed fillets Gilbertville Government granted habeas corpus hearing held injunction injury interest Internal Revenue issue jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Labor liability libel limited ment motion operation parties patent payment Pennsylvania person petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding question Railway Labor Act reason reinsured rule S.Ct School Section service of process Sherman Act Stat statute substantial suit summary judgment supra Supreme Court taxpayer testimony tiff tion trial U. S. Atty Union United States District violation York City