General Revision and Amendment of the Patent Law: Hearing Before the Committee on Patents, House of Representatives, Seventy-second Congress, First Session, on H.R. 10152, H.R. 10153, H.R. 10154, H.R. 10155, H.R. 10156, H.R. 10157, H.R. 9448, H.R. 10741, H.R. 6677, H.R. 7428, H.R. 7245. March 30 and 31, 1932 |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action additional allowed amended American appeal application for patent approve assignee association attorney authorized believe bill Brown CHAIRMAN claim classification Commissioner of Patents Committee on Patents Congress consideration considered corporation court Davis delay disclaimers discovery effect EMERY entirely ether examiners fact favor FENNING filed follows give given going granted hearings held House of Representatives important industry interest interference introduced invention inventor involved issue letter limit litigation manufacture March matter means months Motor objection opinion original passed patent applications patent attorney patent law Patent Office patent system pending period permitting person practice present prior proposed prosecution question reason record reissue renewal Revised Statutes ROBERTSON rule SIROVICH six months statement statute suggested taken term thing tion United vote Washington
Popular passages
Page 6 - Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvements thereof, or who has invented or discovered and asexually reproduced any distinct and new variety of plant, other than a tuber-propagated plant, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 3 - ... in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from other inventions ; and he shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.
Page 4 - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same; and in case of a machine, he...
Page 131 - ... the court may enter judgment therein for any sum above the amount found by the verdict as the actual damages, according to the circumstances of the case, not exceeding three times the amount of such verdict, together with the costs.
Page 8 - ... to kill the same, and such owner, possessor, or person omitting or refusing to comply with the provisions of this section, shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and...
Page 3 - Such oath may be made before any person within the United States authorized by law to administer oaths, or, when the applicant resides in a foreign country, before any minister, charge...
Page 11 - Whenever, through inadvertence, accident, or mistake, and without any fraudulent or deceptive intention, a patentee has claimed more than that of which he was the original or first inventor or discoverer, his patent shall be valid for all that part which is truly and justly his own...
Page 6 - ... country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 3 - In every original application the applicant must distinctly state under oath that to the best of his knowledge and belief the invention has not been in public use or on sale...
Page 21 - ... to hold by virtue of the patent or assignment, stating therein the extent of his interest in such patent. Such disclaimer* shall be in writing, attested by one or more witnesses, and recorded in the Patent Office...