Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and General Legislation of ..., 91-1 on S. 2225 ..., November 20 and December 9, 1969
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
agree agreement agricultural bargaining Agricultural Marketing agricultural products Alabama amended American ANGEVINE association of producers authority bargaining associations believe bill birds Board broiler called Chairman committee commodity Congress contract contractors cooperative County court deal Department Directors discuss economic effective efficient efforts enacted equipment established Fair Practices Act Farm Bureau farmers Federation follows forced give going growers handlers hearing Hood improve income increase individual industry interest join labor legislation letter Marketing Association means meet membership negotiate objectives operations organization percent person position poultry present President problems processing processors producers programs proposed purchase questions reached reasonable record refused represent result Senator ALLEN Senator JORDAN Senator TALMADGE statement subcommittee supply testimony Thank tion United
Page 130 - Witnesses summoned before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in the courts of the United States.
Page 126 - Be it enacted by the Senate and Souse of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the "Arms Control and Disarmament Act Amendments in 1975".
Page 130 - ... (3) No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing books, records, correspondence, documents, or other evidence in obedience to the subpoena of the Board, on the ground that the testimony or evidence required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture...
Page 129 - Upon the filing of the record with it the jurisdiction of the court shall be exclusive and its judgment and decree shall be final...
Page 129 - United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such court a written petition praying that the order of the Board be modified or set aside.
Page 50 - The making of any such agreement shall not be held to be in violation of any of the antitrust laws of the United States, and any such agreement shall be deemed to be lawful: Provided, That no such agreement shall remain in force after the termination of this act.
Page 129 - ... shall have jurisdiction of the proceeding and of the question determined therein, and shall have power to make and enter upon the pleadings, testimony, and proceedings set forth in such transcript a decree affirming, modifying, or setting aside the order of the commission or board.
Page 129 - Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which...
Page 129 - Secretary thereupon shall file in the court the record of the proceedings on which he based his action, as provided in section 2112 of title 28, United States Code. Upon the filing of such petition, the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm the action of the Secretary or to set it aside, in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently, but until the filing of the record, the Secretary may modify or set aside his order.