Hansard's Parliamentary DebatesHansard, 1871 - Great Britain |
Contents
| 15 | |
| 49 | |
| 57 | |
| 59 | |
| 93 | |
| 101 | |
| 153 | |
| 165 | |
| 1421 | |
| 1435 | |
| 1489 | |
| 1505 | |
| 1529 | |
| 1541 | |
| 1573 | |
| 1589 | |
| 211 | |
| 231 | |
| 239 | |
| 253 | |
| 299 | |
| 423 | |
| 435 | |
| 449 | |
| 491 | |
| 539 | |
| 761 | |
| 801 | |
| 813 | |
| 815 | |
| 833 | |
| 843 | |
| 933 | |
| 955 | |
| 1019 | |
| 1061 | |
| 1183 | |
| 1215 | |
| 1253 | |
| 1305 | |
| 1309 | |
| 1323 | |
| 1347 | |
| 1383 | |
| 1399 | |
| 1601 | |
| 1615 | |
| 1635 | |
| 1645 | |
| 1647 | |
| 1657 | |
| 1715 | |
| 1731 | |
| 1737 | |
| 1839 | |
| 1841 | |
| 1845 | |
| 1875 | |
| 1887 | |
| 1 | |
| 21 | |
| 57 | |
| 71 | |
| 101 | |
| 105 | |
| 111 | |
| 127 | |
| 191 | |
| 9 | |
| 17 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Admiralty adopted agreed Amendment Army asked Ballot Bill ballot paper believed Board candidate Charles Adderley clause College Commission Committee consideration considered constitutional course Crown desirable discussion doubt Duke duty EARL GRANVILLE election electors exercise favour Friend the Member Gentleman give given GLADSTONE HENRY SELWIN-IBBETSON House of Commons House of Lords insert Ireland Lordships Majesty Majesty's Government manœuvres Marquess matter measure ment metric system Minister Motion moved naval Navy noble Earl noble Friend noble Lord notice object opinion opposite Parliament Parliamentary passed persons polling polling-places Prerogative present principle proposed provision purchase reference regard Report respect returning officer right hon Roman Catholic Royal Royal Warrant schools second reading Secretary Session ship sion Sir John Sydney Dacres taken thought tion University University of Dublin vernment vote voter W. E. FORSTER William Edward Forster wished words
Popular passages
Page 919 - ... principles of international law which were in force at the time when the claims mentioned in Article I. arose; but that Her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that, in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth...
Page 891 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 921 - They said that they wore instructed to present these claims and to state that they were regarded by Her Majesty's government as coming within the class of subjects indicated by Sir Edward Thornton in his letter of January 26, as subjects for the consideration of the joint high commission.
Page 891 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the base of naval operations against the other, or for tie purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men.
Page 891 - Power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war afs above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 919 - The American Commissioners expressed their regret at this decision of the British Commissioners, and said further that they could not consent to submit the question of the liability of Her Majesty's Government to arbitration unless the principles which should govern the Arbitrator in the consideration of the facts could be first agreed upon.
Page 919 - They said that they should be willing to consider what principles should be adopted for observance in future ; but that they were of opinion that the best mode of conducting an arbitration was to submit the facts to the arbitrator, and leave him free to decide upon them after hearing such arguments as might be necessary.
Page 819 - No election shall be questioned by reason of any polling district not having been constituted in conformity with the provisions of this Act, or by reason of any informality relative to any polling district : (18.) When any day fixed for taking the poll at any election is the day fixed for the holding of the petty sessions court at any polling place, the court shall stand ipso facto adjourned till the next day, which shall in that case be the legal day for holding said court, and if that day be a...