Nomination of Thurgood Marshall: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, First Session on Nomination of Thurgood Marshall, of New York, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967 - 198 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accused admission agree Amendment answer appeal applied authority basis Behrendt believe brief California CHAIRMAN Chief clause committee compelled concern conduct confession Congress Constitution conviction correct counsel course courtroom crime criminal decided decision defendant denied determine dissenting District due process effect enforcement English equal protection evidence exercise fact fair federal Fifth follows Fourteenth Amendment further Gilbert give given going Government hearing held hold hospital identification interpret involved issue Judge MARSHALL judgment judicial Justice lawyer legislation limited lineup majority matter mean ment nomination obtained officers opinion pass person petitioner police position possible present privilege procedure proceedings provision question reason record respect rule Senator Ervin Senator McCLELLAN Senator THURMOND Sixth stage statement statute Stovall Supreme Court suspect testimony things tion trial United violation vote Wade witness York
Page 172 - All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
Page 145 - Every man of an immense crowded audience appeared to me to go away as I did, ready to take arms against writs of assistance. Then and there was the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there the child Independence was born.
Page 145 - It appears to me the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty and the fundamental principles of law, that ever was found in an English law book.
Page 87 - He must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires.
Page 121 - But the prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be witness against himself is a prohibition of the use of physical or moral compulsion to extort communications from him, not an exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material.
Page 139 - The distinction which has emerged, often expressed in different ways, is that the privilege is a bar against compelling "communications" or "testimony," but that compulsion which makes a suspect or accused the source of "real or physical evidence
Page 33 - Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce as defined in this Act, or between any such labor organizations, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties.
Page 48 - It is hardly too strong to say, that the Constitution was made, to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions, real or pretended.