Parliamentary Papers, Volume 8H.M. Stationery Office, 1923 - Bills, Legislative |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 92
Page 2
... round . 11. Is that by reducing the quantity of work to be given out , or does it mean that reduction of bonuses and that kind * See Q. 163 . 23 March 1922 ] of thing have contributed to the 2 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
... round . 11. Is that by reducing the quantity of work to be given out , or does it mean that reduction of bonuses and that kind * See Q. 163 . 23 March 1922 ] of thing have contributed to the 2 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
Page 3
... mean for 1922-23 there will be no saving ? -I will give effect to it in 1923-24 . 18. Supposing you had not gone on , if you had stopped and said : " All right , whatever we have done , so far , we will scrap , " what would have been ...
... mean for 1922-23 there will be no saving ? -I will give effect to it in 1923-24 . 18. Supposing you had not gone on , if you had stopped and said : " All right , whatever we have done , so far , we will scrap , " what would have been ...
Page 5
... mean , it is a greater saving ? - Yes , but into that has been put £ 85,000 for the Representation of the People Act ... mean that . I think they mean that I should not transform all my staff into permanent staff . There is a little mis ...
... mean , it is a greater saving ? - Yes , but into that has been put £ 85,000 for the Representation of the People Act ... mean that . I think they mean that I should not transform all my staff into permanent staff . There is a little mis ...
Page 6
... means sure that they will come to my Department . 54. But they could not put them in your Department if you did not want them , could they ? -No . 55. But really the point is that you will not take on any more permanent staff from the ...
... means sure that they will come to my Department . 54. But they could not put them in your Department if you did not want them , could they ? -No . 55. But really the point is that you will not take on any more permanent staff from the ...
Page 7
... mean a reduction of staff . 73. Why ? Because if you are restrict- ing output within the smallest possible compass it may take more effort relatively to do that than if you supply everything that you are asked for . cern . 74. That is a ...
... mean a reduction of staff . 73. Why ? Because if you are restrict- ing output within the smallest possible compass it may take more effort relatively to do that than if you supply everything that you are asked for . cern . 74. That is a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed Amendment proposed Annesley Somerville asked Ayes Aylmer Hunter-Weston Bill Bowerman Captain Brass Captain Elliot Cecil Beck Chairman Chapple Clause Colonel Archer-Shee Colonel Perkins Committee divided contract Department Duncan Graham estimate Fermor-Hesketh George Government Grattan Doyle Hansard Harbord Harcourt Johnstone Harrison Sir House of Commons Howard Gritten insert the words issue James Stewart Lambert Ward leave Lieut.-Col Lieut.-Colonel Fremantle Lieut.-Colonel Sir Philip Lord Henry Cavendish Major Guy Paget MEMBERS PRESENT ment mittee Neville Chamberlain Noes number of copies Parliament permanent principal Act Question proposed Report Rhys Davies Samuel Roberts Sir Arthur Holbrook Sir Ernest Hiley Sir Francis Lowe Sir Philip Richardson Sir Robert Newman Sir Rowland Blades Sir Wilfrid Sugden Sir William Lane Sir William Raeburn Solicitor-General staff STANDING COMMITTEE Stationery Office Telephone Directory temporary Thomas Loyd Thursday tion Treasury Trevelyan Thomson W. R. CODLING Walter de Frece William Hutchison William Lane Mitchell Windsor-Clive words proposed