Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965 - Interstate commerce
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action Administration advertising American animals appear Association authority believe bill carcinoma cause Chairman changes cigarette advertising cigarette smoking Clinical College Commerce Commission committee concerned conclusion Congress death Department disease Dixon Doctor Education effect evidence experience Experimental fact factors FARNSLEY Federal Trade Commission field FOOTE going Government hazard heart Hospital important incidence increase indicate industry Institute interest Journal KORNEGAY labeling legislation lung cancer matter means Medical Medicine methods Michigan nicotine nonsmokers observed opinion package pathology percent persons position possible practice present problem Public Health Pulmonary question reason referred regulation relationship require respect responsibility Rigdon Rogers of Texas rule School scientific Service Society statement statistical Surgeon Surgery Terry Thank thing tion tobacco United University warning York
Page 51 - ... between manufacturers, or between producers, or between wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between persons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other.
Page 51 - ... brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied to intrastate transactions, under any statute, law, or public policy now or hereafter in effect in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia in which such resale is to be made, or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale...
Page 53 - ... principal office or place of business. The verified return by the person so serving said complaint, order, or other process setting forth the manner of said service shall be proof of the same, and the return post office receipt for said complaint, order, or other process registered and mailed as aforesaid shall be proof of the service of the same.
Page 53 - The Commission may modify its findings as to the facts or make new findings, by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which if supported by substantial evidence shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any, for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence.
Page 52 - Until a transcript of the record In such hearing shall have been filed In a circuit court of appeals of the United States, as hereinafter provided, the commission may at any time, upon such notice and in such manner as it shall deem proper, modify or set aside. In whole or In part, any report or any order made or issued by it under this section.
Page 5 - That the provisions of this Act shall apply to any corporation or any person or persons engaged in the transportation of oil or other commodity, except water and except natural or artificial gas, by means of pipe lines, or partly by pipe lines and partly by railroad, or partly by pipe lines and partly by water, who shall be considered and held to be common carriers within the meaning and purpose of this Act...
Page 53 - ... the president, secretary, or other executive officer or a director of the corporation to be served ; or (b) by leaving a copy thereof at the...
Page 5 - A food shall be deemed to be adulterated— (a) (1) If it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health...
Page 52 - Any person, partnership, or corporation required by an order of the Commission to cease and desist from using any method of competition or act or practice may obtain a review of such order in the circuit court of appeals...
Page 52 - Whenever the commission shall have reason to believe that any such person, partnership, or corporation has been or is using any unfair method of competition in commerce and if it shall appear to the commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public...