The Supreme Court and Patents and MonopoliesPhilip B. Kurland The papers in this collection are drawn from the annual The Supreme Court Review, which, since its inception in 1960, has been regarded by such legal scholars as Robert F. Drinnan, S. J., as "An indispensable, universally quoted work of the highest scholarship regarding the world's most influential tribunal." Now some of the most important contributions to the Review have been brought together in paperback editions that focus on issues that are becoming increasingly relevant to the ordinary citizen's daily life. |
Contents
THE TAMPA ELECTRIC CASE AND THE PROBLEM OF EXCLU | 70 |
A NOTE ON BLOCK BOOK | 136 |
NEW STANDARDS | 161 |
NEITHER | 215 |
REGULATION BY COM | 255 |
NOTES ON A CLOSING | 279 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement antitrust laws applied argued argument Bausch & Lomb Beech-Nut buyers Clayton Act Colgate combination commercial success competitors concerned contracts Corp cost Credit Corporation Cudahy customers Davis dealers decision defendant defendant's dissent district court doctrine ECON economic effect enforcement exclusive arrangements exclusive dealing fact federal firms Fortner Ibid illegal industry innovation interests Interstate Circuit invention involved issue jobbers Judge Justice Black Kewanee litigation manufacturer market power ment merger monopoly non-obviousness novelty opinion outlets Parke patent law Patent Office plaintiff potential competition price fixing prior art problem public utility purchasers question reason refusal to sell regulation regulatory relevant resale price maintenance restraints restriction result retailers rule Sears seller Sherman Act sold Standard Stations statute substantial suggested Supp supra note Supreme Court tie-in tion Trade Commission trust laws tying product U.S. Steel United unlawful violation wholesalers