Sovereign Immunity: Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session : Oversight Hearing to Provide for Indian Legal Reform, Part 1
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998 - Federally recognized Indian tribes - 3 pages
"March 11, 1998, Washington, DC"--Pt. 1.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action addition adopted agreements allow amendments American Indian appellant apply arbitration authority casino Chairman Chief Choctaw Choctaw Nation cigarettes citizens civil claims Code collect Committee Community Congress Constitution continue contract corporation dated deal decision Department district economic effect enforce enter excise taxes existing federal court federal government funds gaming give governmental guarantees hearing important imposed Indian Affairs Indian reservations Indian tribes interests issue Judge jurisdiction justice land legislation limited living March matter Minnesota motor fuel Native American non-Indian obligation Oklahoma operate parties person political problem protect question race recognized regulations relationship reported reservation residents Resolution responsibility result retail rules Senator sovereignty Stat suit Supreme Court tort treaties Tribal Council Tribal Court tribal governments tribal sovereign immunity United waive waiver Washington
Page 312 - But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.
Page 206 - It is unlawful for any national bank, or any corporation organized by authority of any law of Congress, to make a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election to any political office...
Page 576 - No treaty for the cession of any portion or part of the reservation herein described which may be held in common shall be of any validity or force as against the said Indians, unless executed and signed by at least three fourths of all the adult male Indians, occupying or interested in the same...
Page 244 - It is the young men who say yes or no. He who led the young men is dead. It is cold and we have no blankets. The little children are freezing to death. My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are — perhaps freezing to death.
Page 576 - The Indian nations had always been considered as distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights, as the undisputed possessors of the soil from time immemorial, with the single exception of that imposed by irresistible power, which excluded them from intercourse with any other European potentate than the first discoverer of the coast of the particular region claimed...
Page 479 - The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent...
Page 158 - If it be true that the Cherokee Nation have rights, this is not the tribunal in which those rights are to be asserted. If it be true that wrongs have been inflicted, and that still greater are to be apprehended, this is not the tribunal which can redress the past or prevent the future.
Page 245 - Let me be a free man— free to travel, free to stop, free to work, free to trade where I choose, free to choose my own teachers, free to follow the religion of my fathers, free to think and talk and act for myself— and I will obey every law, or submit to the penalty.
Page 245 - Whenever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other, then we shall have no more wars. We shall be all alike, brothers of one father and one mother, with one sky above us and one country around us, and one government for all. Then the Great Spirit Chief who rules above will smile upon this land, and send rain to wash out the bloody spots made by brothers' hands upon the face of the earth.