Codes of Fair Competition as Approved [June 16, 1933]-July 30, 1935: With Supplemental Codes, Amendments, Executive and Administrative Orders Issued Between These Dates, Volume 23U.S. Government Printing Office, 1933 - Competition |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Administrative Officer Allied Products Supplement amended complies AMENDMENT TO CODE annexed report Approval recommended Article VII authority vested BARTON W cement Code as amended Code Authority Code of Fair Cotton Deputy Administrator Distributing Trade divisional code effective date effectuate the policies employees exemption Fabricated Metal Products facturing Fair Competition Finishing and Metal hereby order including Executive Order Industrial Recovery Act Industrial Recovery Board Industry Date Volume Jobbers June 16 Machinery and Allied Manu Manufac Manufacturing and Metal Manufacturing Industry ment Metal Coating Supplement Metal Finishing Metal Products Manufacturing National Industrial Recovery National Recovery Administration Northwest industry operation policies and purposes policies of Title President promote the policies provisions relevant pursuant to authority Retail September 27 stay relevant Subdivision Subsection Supplementary Code tend to effectuate Territory of Hawaii Textile tion VIII W. A. HARRIMAN wages WHEREAS XVII XVIII XXII XXIII ΧΙ
Popular passages
Page 129 - That employees shall have the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and shall be free from the interference, restraint, or coercion of employers of labor, or their agents, in the designation of such representatives or in self-organization or in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection...
Page 384 - Congress the necessary resources of flexibility and practicality, which will enable it to perform its function in laying down policies and establishing standards, while leaving to selected instrumentalities the making of subordinate rules within prescribed limits and the determination of facts to which the policy as declared by the legislature is to apply.
Page 254 - ... to provide for the general welfare by promoting the organization of industry for the purpose of cooperative action among trade groups, to induce and maintain united action of labor and management under adequate governmental sanctions and supervision...
Page 240 - to remove obstructions to the free flow of interstate and foreign commerce which tend to diminish the amount thereof, and to provide for the general welfare by promoting the organization of industry for the purpose of cooperative action among trade groups, to induce and maintain united action of labor and management under adequate governmental sanctions and supervision...
Page 386 - Unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of articles into the United States, or in their sale by the owner, importer, consignee, or agent of either, the effect or tendency of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry, efficiently and economically operated, in the United States...
Page 392 - So far as the poultry here in question is concerned, the flow in interstate commerce had ceased. The poultry had come to a permanent rest within the State. It was not held, used, or sold by defendants in relation to any further transactions in interstate commerce and was not destined for transportation to other States.
Page 390 - Section 3 of the Recovery Act is without precedent. It supplies no standards for any trade, industry or activity. It does not undertake to prescribe rules of conduct to be applied to particular states of fact determined by appropriate administrative procedure. Instead of prescribing rules of conduct, it authorizes the making of codes to prescribe them.
Page 241 - Inequitable restrictions on admission to membership therein and are truly representative of such trades or Industries or subdivisions thereof, and (2) that such code or codes are not designed to promote monopolies or to eliminate or oppress small enterprises and will not operate to discriminate against them...
Page 395 - It is not the province of the Court to consider the economic advantages or disadvantages of such a centralized system. It is sufficient to say that the Federal Constitution does not provide for it.
Page 395 - The authority of the federal government may not be pushed to such an extreme as to destroy the distinction, which the commerce clause itself establishes, between commerce "among the several States" and the internal concerns of a State.