...provisions of a treaty. Lotir Wolf v. Hitchcock ( 187 US 553, 064 ; 23 S. Ct. 216, 47 L. ed. 290) . The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government 'to give the tribal land to others, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering, or assuming an obligation...

...such a guardianship and to pertinent constitutional restrictions. It did not enable the United States to give the tribal lands to others, or to appropriate...assuming an obligation to render, just compensation for them; for that "would not be an exercise of guardianship, but an act of confiscation." Lane v. Pueblo...

...provisions of a treaty. Lone Wolf v. HitcJicock (187 US 553, 564, 565, 566; 23 S. Ct. 216. 47 L. Ed. 299). The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government 'to give the tribal land to others, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering, or assuming an obligation...

...provisions of a treaty. Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (187 US 553, 564, 565, 566; S. Ct. 216, 47 L. Ed. 299). The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government 'to give the tribal lauds to others, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering or assuming an obligation...

...provisions of a treaty. Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (187 US 553, 564, 565, 566; 23 S. Ct. 216, 47 L. Ed. 299). The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government 'to give the tribal land to others, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering, or assuming an obligation...

...unanimous decision and it places together in its closing of the opinion the following statements, to wit : "The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government 'to give thp tribal lands to others, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering or assuming...

...hold and manage the property and affairs of the Indians in good faith for their betterment and welfare does not extend so far as to enable the Government to give their lands to others and to appropriate them to its own purposes. The Shoshone Indians were awarded...

...control and manage the property and affairs of the Indians in good faith for their betterment and welfare does not extend so far as to enable the government to give the land to others or to appropriate them to its own purposes. The case of Leavenworth, et al. RR Co. v....

...such guardianship and to pertinent constitutional restrictions. It did not enable the United States to give the tribal lands to others, or to appropriate...assuming an obligation to render, just compensation for them; for that would not be an exercise of guardianship but an act of confiscation. In that brief recital...

...be exerted in many ways and at time even in derogation of the provisions of a treaty [citing cases]. The power does not extend so far as to enable the Government "to give the tribal lands to another, or to appropriate them to its own purposes, without rendering, or assuming an obligation to...