There is an obvious distinction between a cropper and a tenant. One has a possession of the premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather... A Short History of Reconstruction - Page 269by Eric Foner - 2010 - 320 pagesLimited preview - About this book
| Georgia. Supreme Court - Equity - 1873 - 764 pages
...one has a right for 3 The Cape Fear Steamboat Company va. Torrent et al. fixed time; the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land i» with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of the tenant.... | |
| Abram Warren Thompson - Agricultural laws and legislation - 1876 - 556 pages
...premises exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper, This is not so of the tenant."... | |
| Charles Greenstreet Addison - Contracts - 1888 - 864 pages
...tenancy. The title to the crop subject to the wages is in the owner of the land, the cropper only having a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. Appling v. Odom, 46 Ga. 583. See also Huffr. Watkins, 15 8. C. 82. Letting land to a person for one... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1904 - 1122 pages
...exclusive of the land owner, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of toe tenant.... | |
| Enoch Marvin Banks - Agriculture - 1905 - 158 pages
...exclusive of the landlord; the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time ; the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of the tenant.... | |
| History - 1912 - 542 pages
...premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. The case made in the record is... | |
| Robert Preston Brooks - Business & Economics - 1914 - 142 pages
...premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. The case made in the record is... | |
| George Simon Wehrwein - 1922 - 450 pages
...premises, exclusive of the landlord; the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time; the other has only a right to go on the land, to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of land is with the owner as against the oropper. This is not so of the tenant. ., .The... | |
| Chunchang Gao - History - 2000 - 340 pages
...court decisions of Georgia a defined sharecropper not as a "partner." but as a wage laborer owning "only a right to go on the land to plant. work. and gather the crop." 1008 If blacks tried to go on strike. their leaders were soon arrested. and the strike crushed.1009... | |
| |