The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ., Volume 40Butterworths, 1964 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 47
Page 156
... risk of injury- implied . It is here that serious controversy begins . In what circumstances is it legitimate to imply such a consent ? How far does a man's encountering risk knowingly show that he does it voluntarily ? This is " the ...
... risk of injury- implied . It is here that serious controversy begins . In what circumstances is it legitimate to imply such a consent ? How far does a man's encountering risk knowingly show that he does it voluntarily ? This is " the ...
Page 157
... risk , ( q ) it is submitted that it is now clear that for volenti to succeed the circumstances must be such as to support the inference that the plaintiff consented to bear not merely the physical , but also the legal , risk . This ...
... risk , ( q ) it is submitted that it is now clear that for volenti to succeed the circumstances must be such as to support the inference that the plaintiff consented to bear not merely the physical , but also the legal , risk . This ...
Page 158
... risk was , the distinction between physical and legal risk cannot have been put to them with equal clarity for the issue was at best ambiguous and the Judge had not expanded the issue in his summing up . ( 2 ) The validity of the second ...
... risk was , the distinction between physical and legal risk cannot have been put to them with equal clarity for the issue was at best ambiguous and the Judge had not expanded the issue in his summing up . ( 2 ) The validity of the second ...
Contents
34 | 5 |
Metal Workers Ltd v New Plymouth | 6 |
Takeover Bids and the Press | 12 |
Copyright | |
44 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement Amendment Act appellant application Auckland authority barrister Board was delivered Borough Council breach building City Council claim Commercial Commissioner Committee consent contract Council Town counsel Country Planning Act Country Planning Appeal course Court of Appeal damages decision defendant delivered by KEALY district scheme duty effect erection evidence fact granted Hardie Boys held hire purchase Honour Hutt income industrial Inland Revenue interest Judge judgment jury Justice KEALY S.M. Chairman Law Society lawyer legislation liability Licensing Lower Hutt Magistrate matter ment Mount Roskill negligence offence owner parties person plaintiff Planning Act 1953 Planning Appeal Board practice profession proposed provisions purchase question reason referred regard registered Regulations residential respect respondent Council road rule Safeways solicitor Supreme Court testator tion Town and Country Trustee Turner University of Auckland Wanganui Wanganui River Wellington Whangarei Zealand Law zoned