 ... must be of such a nature as to mark the objects so designated as peculiarly requiring exclusive legislation. There must be a substantial distinction, having a reference to the subject-matter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places...  Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana - Page 644by Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1913Full view - About this book
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 678 pages
...matter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation, and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...for, or justify, the restriction of the legislation." It is said that the county of Camden is the only one in the state in which the county clerk is paid... | |
 | Law - 1896 - 866 pages
...matter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...for or justify the restriction of the legislation." In Anderson v. City of Trenton, 42 NJ Law, 486, a statute, which purported to confer upon all cities... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1904 - 1108 pages
...subject-matter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...for or justify the restriction of the legislation.' Or, to state it differently, though not so well, the true practical limitation of the legislative power... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 1164 pages
...subjectmatter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...for or justify the restriction of the legislation." See, also, IMurnane v. City of St. Louis, 123 Mo. 479, 27 SW 711. The rule announced by the above authorities... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1902 - 1188 pages
...subjectmatter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...reasonable degree, at least, account for or justify the restrictions of the legislation." State v. Hammer, 42 NJ Law, 435, 440. "Such law must embrace all,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 1000 pages
...such as are not illusory or fraudulent in their character. It is said in Richards v. Hammer, that ' the marks of distinction on which the classification...will, in some reasonable degree at least, account for and justify the restriction of the legislation.' In brief, there must be a true, substantial classification... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 956 pages
...illusory or fraudulent in their character. It is said in Richards v. Hammer [42 XJ Law, 440 J that •the marks of distinction on which the classification...will, in some reasonable degree at least, account for and justify the restriction of the legislation.' In brief, there must be ;i true, substantial classification,... | |
 | New Jersey. Legislature. General Assembly - New Jersey - 1885 - 1050 pages
...character." In Hammer vs. State ex. rel. Richards (15 Vr. 669, &c.) the Court of Errors holds that "the marks of distinction, on which the classification...will, in some reasonable degree at least, account for and justify the restriction of the legislation. In brief, there must be a true, substantial classification,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 956 pages
...subject-matter of the proposed legislation, between the objects or places embraced in such legislation and the objects or places excluded. The marks of distinction...reasonable degree, at least, account for or justify tlie restriction of the legislation." Tested by the rules above stated, there can be no doubt, I think,... | |
| |
