American Law Reports Annotated, Volume 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 96
Page 42
... testified that they did not hear any whistle , while six others testified that the reg- ular crossing signals were given , and they sustained their testimony by cir- cumstances such that the court found it impossible for them to be ...
... testified that they did not hear any whistle , while six others testified that the reg- ular crossing signals were given , and they sustained their testimony by cir- cumstances such that the court found it impossible for them to be ...
Page 80
... testified that as she approached the crossing with two small children she was walking , that she did not hear the train whistle or bell , and that her hearing was good , and another witness testified that he saw the plaintiff just going ...
... testified that as she approached the crossing with two small children she was walking , that she did not hear the train whistle or bell , and that her hearing was good , and another witness testified that he saw the plaintiff just going ...
Page 89
... testified that she was on horseback , riding very slowly as she approached the crossing , that she was listening for the signal , by bell or whistle , for the approach of a train , and heard none , and there was evidence of other ...
... testified that she was on horseback , riding very slowly as she approached the crossing , that she was listening for the signal , by bell or whistle , for the approach of a train , and heard none , and there was evidence of other ...
Contents
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York