American Law Reports Annotated, Volume 162Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1946 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 99
Page 23
... bell ring , furnishes some evidence that the bell was not ringing , and , if he is positive that the bell was not rung , he furnishes strong evidence that the bell was not ring- ing . " Distinguishing between testimony that the witness ...
... bell ring , furnishes some evidence that the bell was not ringing , and , if he is positive that the bell was not rung , he furnishes strong evidence that the bell was not ring- ing . " Distinguishing between testimony that the witness ...
Page 43
... bell , and none of the others testified that it was not ringing ; judgment for the plaintiff reversed ) ; White v . Lehigh Valley R. Co. ( 1924 ) 211 App Div 177 , 206 NYS 749 ; Kulp Transp . Lines v . Erie R. Co. ( 1928 ) 132 Misc 821 ...
... bell , and none of the others testified that it was not ringing ; judgment for the plaintiff reversed ) ; White v . Lehigh Valley R. Co. ( 1924 ) 211 App Div 177 , 206 NYS 749 ; Kulp Transp . Lines v . Erie R. Co. ( 1928 ) 132 Misc 821 ...
Page 85
... bell at the warning post . They rushed immedi- ately to the windows or other points of observation to see what is meant . We must assume under the finding of the jury that the train was going at a high rate of speed . We must also as ...
... bell at the warning post . They rushed immedi- ately to the windows or other points of observation to see what is meant . We must assume under the finding of the jury that the train was going at a high rate of speed . We must also as ...
Contents
Introduction and survey | 10 |
Distinction between testimony that signals were not given | 22 |
Comparative probative force of testimony that signals were not given | 28 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed Ann Cas annotation App Div appeal applied bell bonds child claim Conflict of Laws Constitution contract convey covenant criminal crossing signals declarations declarations against interest defendant dence disqualified effect employee enforce estoppel evidence F Supp facie fact Federal statute grantor Headnote hear heard held infra insured interest Iowa judge judgment jurisdiction jury land lease legitimate liquidated damages ment Mo App NE2d negative ness Okla opinion option overtime P. R. Co party penal penalty peremptory challenges person plaintiff positive presumption probative force provision purchase question quitclaim deed reason restraints on alienation rule against perpetuities rung signals were given sounded St Rep stat statute of limitations statutory suit supra Supreme Court SW2d testi testimony Tex Civ App tion train approached trial United validity violation whistle witness not dealt writ of certiorari York