Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

On November 13, 1979, I wrote to you regarding the Social Security Retirement Test Rules Bill (H.R. 5295). It is my understanding that on December 19, 1979, the U. S. House of Representatives passed the changes 383-0 and that the bill now goes to the Senate for its consideration. Since you are Chairman of the Senate Social Security subcommittee, I urge your support in the passage of this bill which would correct the injustice that would be done to insurance agents who have paid into the Social Security system for years and who would need the retirement benefits they planned on receiving.

I would appreciate hearing from you on the status of this bill and how you personally feel on this matter so vital to so many.

Sincerely,

Gordon H, Herwig

Manager, Life Department

GHH:ds

[blocks in formation]

I am sure that you are well aware that the House passed H. R. 5295 on Dec. 19th, by a vote of 382 yeas to O nays.

I am asking for your support in the passing of this legislation when it reaches the Senate.

In my estination, in todays era of Inflation, it is avery unfair element to have a retired Insurance man's or ladie's Social Security benefit decreased because of an income from a renewal account that was earned and established by efforts prior to age 65. In my estimation that incone from this source should be treated the same as rental income from a prior investment such as apartments, houses, etc.

Your support and the support of all your fellow Senators behind this legislation will erase this inequity.

Thank You:

Sincerely,

Marina & Bickers

Narvin E. Becker

28474 Huntington St.
Kerton, Wi.

53056

Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Company

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

99 MILWAUKEE STREET

POST OFFICE BOX 1508

LA CROSSE, WISCONSIN 54601
TELEPHONE 784-7737 AREA CODE 608

February 26, 1980

[ocr errors]

Honorable Gaylord Nelson
221 Russell

Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Nelson:

It is my understanding that H.R. 5925 which passed the House in December is now pending in the Senate Finance Committee. Passage of this bill is vital to the welfare of many retired or retiring professionals and we are most interested in its progress. Has this bill come before the Senate Social Security Subcommittee? Could you give some indication of how it is likely to proceed through the Senate and its prospects for passage during this session? I am told that the vote in the House was 389 - 0. Is it likely that the Senate would pass it quickly if no opposition develops?

Sincerely,

Wish Harding

Richard G. Hawkins

RGH/jw

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

are of the rectims of the abolition of

The Emonthly Earnin

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Fritired from teaching,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

of 77 and even our Milwauker Sic Security Ceffece comuld be of title help had will finawledge &

[ocr errors]

tine's micthing about the law.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

первастай And I teen aware of the two, I would have conuicted to teach with

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

law would correct.

the problems which caused

a

loss to retired teacher

Very truly yours,

Fynice & Curtea
Rt.4
Platteville

Wie.

« PreviousContinue »