 But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application of the original thought, a change only in form, proportions or degree, the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means...  Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports - Page 772by United States. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals - 1933Full view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1875 - 732 pages
...the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent. These rules apply alike, whether what preceded was covered by a patent or rested only in public knowledge... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 780 pages
...change only in form, proportions or degree, doing the same thing in the same way, by substantially the same means, with better results, is not such invention as will sustain patent. Id. 8. Patents claiming merely improvements in devices already well exploited in prior art... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 1122 pages
...the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent." The petition will be dismissed. It is so ordered. GRAHAM, Judge; HAY, Judge; DOWNEY, Judge; and CAMPBELL,... | |
 | Law - 1885 - 550 pages
...the substitution of equivalents doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent." The case of Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 US 347, is much in point. The patent was for an improvement which... | |
 | Law - 1875 - 722 pages
...the substitution of equivalents doing substantially the same thing in the same way, by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent. This is so also whether what preceded was covered by a patent, or rested only in public knowledge and... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 2268 pages
...the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing In the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent. These rules apply alike, whether what preceded was covered by a patent or rested only in public knowledge... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 2096 pages
...substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the siiuie. wuy by substantially the same means with better results, — is not such invention as will sustain a patent." This principle has been enforced in many more recent cases. Este^ v. Burdett, 109 US 633, 3 Sup. Ct.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 2170 pages
...substitution of equivalents doing substantially the same thing In the same way, by substantially tlie same means, with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent" Here we have but a mere carrying forward, a new or more extended application of the conception of the... | |
 | Hubert Ashley Banning, United States. Circuit Courts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 730 pages
...the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent." And again, in Roberts v. Ryer, 1 Otto, 157, it is said: " It is no new invention to use an old machine... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 732 pages
...the substitution of equivalents doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent." œ The case of Beokendorfer v. Faber, 92 US 347, is much in point. The épatent was for an improvement... | |
| |
