In Appendix A are given the changes and addition to the section of the Manual assigned to this Committee. This report is brief because of the intensive work done by this Committee last year in anticipation of the publication of the new Manual.

(2) Wooden Trestles-Open-Deck, Multiple-Story and Ballast-Deck In Appendix B-Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, the Committee reports on subject No. 2, which has been before this Committee for two years for investigation and study. The Committee's recommendations are given under the heading of Conclusions.

(3) Fireproofing Wooden Bridges and Trestles

In Appendix C the Committee submits report on subject No. 3 and its recommendations are given under the heading of Conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The Committee recommends that the changes and additions to the Manual as given in Appendix A be approved.

2. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard OpenDeck Pile Trestles, Light Design, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 1, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

3. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard OpenDeck Pile Trestles, Heavy Design, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 2, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

4. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard Open-Deck Frame Trestle, Light Design, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 3, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

5. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard OpenDeck Frame Trestle, Heavy Design, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 4, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

6. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard MultipleStory Trestles, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 5, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

7. The Committee recommends that the plans for standard BallastDeck Trestles, as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit 6, be approved for printing in the Manual as recommended practice.

8. The Committee recommends that the recommendations as good practice in the report of the Sub-Committee on fireproofing wooden bridges and trestles, as given in Appendix C, be approved for printing in the Manual.

9. The Committee recommends that the outline of work for the ensuing year be received as information for the use of the Committee on Outline of Work.

10. The Committee submits in Appendix B, Exhibits 7, 8, abstracts of data and questionnaires, as information.

Outline of Work for Next Year's Study and Report

A. O. RIDGWAY, Chairman; W. H. Hoyt, A. M. Van Auken, C. S. HERITAGE, H. AUSTILL, Sub-Committee.

1. Report on classification and grading rules for hardwood timber and lumber for railroad purposes.

2. Study and report on the useful strength of new, old and treated timber when used in railroad trestles, including a critical examination of the present theories of stresses when applied to timber under railroad load conditions.

3. Study and report on proper organization of Bridge and Building Departments.

4. Study and report on system of trestle inspection and reports covering the same.

Respectfully submitted,

THE COMMITTEE ON WOODEN BRIDGES AND Trestles,

W. H. HOYT, Chairman.

Appendix A

(1) REVISION of manUAL

A. O. RIDGWAY, Chairman; H. T. HAZEN, D. W. SMITH, SubCommittee.

Your Committee recommends the following changes in the Definitions, now in the Manual:

Ballast Curb-A longitudinal timber placed along the outer edge of the floor on ballast deck bridges to retain the ballast.

(2) STANDARD PLANS FOR Wooden TRESTLES

BY THE COMMITTEE

Your Committee has had this subject under investigation and study during the two past years, having presented a progress report at the last convention. The Committee early this year issued a questionnaire on prevailing practice of railroads in design and use of wooden trestles, including details of multiple-story and ballast-deck trestles. The Committee carried on a voluminous correspondence with various authorities and encouraged engineering magazine discussion of some of its problems.

The Committee early in its studies realized that whatever plans it might present would be compromises of many viewpoints and would not therefore meet the complete approval of every engineer. Many good arguments may be advanced for plans and details other than those offered by the Committee. The Committee, however, has endeavored to recommend what in its judgment would make a consistent, conservative, safe and economical design. There will doubtless be some who would build lighter and others who would build heavier structures. In presenting four plans, using 12- and 16-ft. spans for light and heavy loading, the Committee feels that it has provided in a reasonable way for all railroad service trestles, except the temporary logging road, and heaviest railroad service where steel or concrete should be given serious consideration. The two spans provide for trestles in districts where the timber runs small and for districts where splendid heavy timber is available.

The Committee realizes that unlike many other forms of railroad material and structures where new material is being ordered every year, timber trestles are in most cases already installed and each railroad already has its own standards which will vary from the Committee's plans. Furthermore, many railroads have already large stocks of sizes of timber suitable for their own standards of construction. Therefore, these proposed standards will only be of value for comparison with present structures when either changes in existing standards are suggested or new railroad trestles are being planned. These plans, unless adopted by each railroad, will not affect materially the present demands on the timber supplies of the country. On the other side, if by chance these plans should supplant those already in use by the railroads, the variety of span and loading offered will give opportunity for the economical use of existing supplies of timber.

The Committee would therefore receive criticism in the spirit that there are many viewpoints in the design of these structures, but that it had after due investigation and study submitted these plans as its best judgment and maintains its support on these grounds.

The Committee spent a large amount of time and thought on the length of spans to be recommended. In last year's progress report it suggested a twelve-foot span. After careful consideration of the advan