...which competition is injurious to the commerce and to the states from and to which the commerce flows. The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control. McCray v. United States, 195 US 27; Sonzinsky...

...which competition is injurious to the commerce and to the States from and to which the commerce flows. "The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate commerce are matters fur legislative Judgment upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no estriction and over...

...pointed out in this decision that "the motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate commerce on matters for the legislative Judgment upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control." The Thomas bill's proposed extension of...

...v. Darby Lumber Co. ((1941) 61 Sup. Ct. 451), the Supreme Court stated thaf'the motive and nurpose of a regulation of interstate commerce are matters...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control." See also Roland Electric Co. v. Walling...

...actually an effort to regulate the wages and hours of persons engaged in manufacture. Justice Stone said : "The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate...restrictions and over which the courts are given no control'' (p. 115). Since Congress had "plenary power" over the interstate shipment of goods, it could bar such...

...commerce power, but that it is enough that the matters so regulated are within or affect interstate commerce. "The motive and purpose of a regulation...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control," 312 US at 115. That the effect upon commerce...

...commerce power, but that it is enough that the matters so regulated are within or affect interstate commerce. "The motive and purpose of a regulation...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control," 312 US at 115. That the effect upon commerce...

...commerce power, but that it is enough that the matters so regulated are within or affect interstate commerce. "The motive and purpose of a regulation...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control," 312 US at 115. That the effect upon commerce...

...the proscribed goods In Interstate commerce, the Court considered the nature of the commerce power: "The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control. JfcCroy v. United States, 195 US 27 ; Sonzinsky...

...the proscribed goods in Interstate commerce, the Court considered the nature of the commerce power: "The motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate...upon the exercise of which the Constitution places no restriction and over which the courts are given no control. McCray v. United States, 195 US 27 ; Sonzinsky...