been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by a statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought." It was held by the Supreme Court of the American Law Reports Annotated - Page 3031927Full view - About this book
| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1940 - 894 pages
...whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with...the party for whose benefit the action is brought; and when a statute of the United States so provides, an action for the use or benefit of another shall... | |
| 1860 - 1204 pages
...administrator, a guardian, a trustee of sm express trust, a party with whom, or in whose name a contract is made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by г " то ' statute, may r*ue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit... | |
| Political science - 1917 - 272 pages
...whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the party in whose interest the action is brought. 15. Every action shall be commenced by the service of a summons... | |
| Iowa. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 874 pages
...administrator, a guardian, a trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract is made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name, without joining with him the party for whose benelit the suit is... | |
| Electronic journals - 1890 - 948 pages
...1991. "An executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the person for whose benefit the suit is prosecuted. A trustee of an express trust, within the meaning... | |
| Electronic journals - 1890 - 986 pages
...1991. "An executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the person for whose benefit the suit is prosecuted. A trustee of an express trust, within the meaning... | |
| Washington University (Saint Louis, Mo.) - 1914 - 426 pages
...whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name, without joining...the party for whose benefit the action is brought." 12 These exceptions are not to be taken, however, in unrestricted literal import. True representation... | |
| Michigan - Law - 1915 - 1342 pages
...has been made for the benefit of .•mother, or a party expressly authorized by statute, may suein his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought: Provided, That any person to proviso, whom a cause of action shall accrue upon the bond of any jJJiSf... | |
| New York (State). Board of Statutory Consolidation - Civil procedure - 1915 - 466 pages
...administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is... | |
| Joseph Robinson Darling - Sherman anti-trust law, 1890 - 1915 - 268 pages
...administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by statute, may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is... | |
| |