Parliamentary Papers, Volume 6H.M. Stationery Office, 1923 - Bills, Legislative |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page v
... Asked why a retired officer could not be obtained this year as in 1914 , it was stated that it would not be possible to get a retired officer at £ 300 a year to do that work now and that the principle was laid down in 1919 that Naval ...
... Asked why a retired officer could not be obtained this year as in 1914 , it was stated that it would not be possible to get a retired officer at £ 300 a year to do that work now and that the principle was laid down in 1919 that Naval ...
Page xv
... Asked why a retired officer could not be obtained this year as in 1914 , it was stated that it would not be possible to get a retired officer at £ 300 a year to do that work now and that the principle was laid down in 1919 that Naval ...
... Asked why a retired officer could not be obtained this year as in 1914 , it was stated that it would not be possible to get a retired officer at £ 300 a year to do that work now and that the principle was laid down in 1919 that Naval ...
Page 7
... asked . 97. I would like to carry it a little further and to put to Sir Charles Walker whether he could do this for us - whether he could have a table prepared for this Committee in the course of the next few meetings showing what were ...
... asked . 97. I would like to carry it a little further and to put to Sir Charles Walker whether he could do this for us - whether he could have a table prepared for this Committee in the course of the next few meetings showing what were ...
Page 9
... asking as to whether it ought to be revised or touched , but the Hon . Member asked is it possible to revise it , and I understood you to say that for the officers it could not be revised until July 1924 ? That is so . 117. Is it ...
... asking as to whether it ought to be revised or touched , but the Hon . Member asked is it possible to revise it , and I understood you to say that for the officers it could not be revised until July 1924 ? That is so . 117. Is it ...
Page 11
... asked to get , but 1 would say as regards that , that a com- parison between an officer in the Mer- chant Service and an officer in the Navy is not very valuable because the responsi- bilities are so totally different ; you would never ...
... asked to get , but 1 would say as regards that , that a com- parison between an officer in the Mer- chant Service and an officer in the Navy is not very valuable because the responsi- bilities are so totally different ; you would never ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Admiral Superintendent Admiralty Air Commodore Air Force Air Ministry Amendment proposed Army Arthur Michael Samuel Assistant Director bonus boys C. J. NAEF C.B. Continued cadets Captain Brass Captain Viscount Curzon Chairman Chief Civil Civilian Class Clause Colonel Assheton Pownall Colonel Stephenson Committee cost of living Cranwell Department Deputy diem and allowances Dockyard Clerks Draughtsmen Engineer Estimates farm figure flying Foremen full pay Gallery Halton Hannon Harmsworth High Commissioners hospital House increase insert the words Inspector Lieut.-Colonel Lieutenant Lord Eustace Percy Medical ment Naval Officers Navy Neville Chamberlain Ordnance pay and allowances Pennefather pension present question rank rates of pay reduction Royal salary seats Secretary Senior ships Sir Archibald Sinclair Sir CHARLES WALKER Sir Philip Pilditch Sir Robert Newman Sir WALTER NICHOLSON Sir Wilfrid Sugden Sir William Raeburn Somerville Staff Clerk Store Officers Sub-head Superintendent tion Typists Victualling Vote wages