COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO THE OGDEN Land Co.'s CLAIM.

Ogden v. Lee (6 Hill., 546).

Fellows v. Lee (5 Den., 628).

Wadsworth v. Buff. Hyd. Asso. (15 Barb., 83).

People v. Pierre (18 Misc., 83).

Blacksmith v. Fellows (7 N. Y., 401).

Fellows v. Blacksmith (19 How. U. S., 366).
New York v. Dibble (2Ì How. U. S., 366).
The New York Indians (5 Wal. U. S., 761).
Seneca Nation v. Christie (49 Hun., 524).
Senaca Nation v. Christie (126 N. Y., 122).
Seneca Nation v. Christie (162 U. S., 283).
Seneca Nation v. Appleby (127 A. D., 770).
Senaca Nation v. Appleby (196 N. Y., 318).
Jemison v. Bell Telephone Co. (186 N. Y., 493).

New York Indians v. U. S. (30 Ct. Cls., 413).

Unless otherwise specified references are to New York State court reports. Many of the cases hereinafter cited under the Seneca and Tonowanda Tribes also touch on the origin of the Ogden Land Co.'s claim.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASES.

Leading cases of the United States Supreme Court touching on the Indian question generally, especially titles and the power of the Federal Government over their affairs, but not relating specifically to the Indians in New York:

Johnson v. McIntosh (8 Wheat., 543).

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (5 Pet., 1).
Wooster v. Georgia (6 Pet., 515).
Mitchell v. United States (9 Pet., 711).
The Kansas Indians (5 Wal., 737).

Cherokee Tobacco Case (11 Wal., 616).

United States v. Cook (19 Wal., 591).

United States v. Kagama (118 U. S., 375).

Choctaw Nation v. United States (119 U. S., 1).

Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (187 U. S., 553).

Supreme Court decisions relating exclusively to the New York Indians:
Fellows v. Blacksmith (19 How., 366).

New York v. Dibble (21 How., 366).

The New York Indians (5 Wal., 761).

Seneca Nation v. Christie (162 U. S., 283).

New York Indians v. United States (170 U. S., 1).

United States v. New York Indians (173 U. S., 464).

See also Benson v. United States (44 Fed., 178).

NEW YORK STATE COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO, arranged BY TRIBES.

Jimeson v.

Tonawanda.

Bell Telephone Co. (109 A. D., 911).

Jimeson v. Bell Telephone Co., affirmed (186 N. Y., 493).

Hatch v. Luckman (64 Misc., 508).*

Hatch v. Luckman (155 A. D., 765).*

Blacksmith v. Fellows (7 N. Y. 3 Sel., 401).

Fellow v. Blacksmith (19 How., 366).

New York v. Dibble (21 How., 366).

People v. Soper (7 N. Y., 428).

Blacksmith v. Tracy (1 Denio, 617).

In re Jack (52 Misc., 424).

Peters v. Tallchief (52 Misc., 617).

Tuscarora.

Peters v. Tallchief, reversed (121 A. D., 309).*

Cusick v. Daly (78 Misc., 657).

Cusick v. Daly, reversed (212 N. Y., 183).*

Bates v. Printup (31 Misc., 17).

In re Printup (121 A. D., 322).

Cases marked * will be found to contain much valuable information.

Cayuga.

Cayuga Nation v. Land Commissioners (74 Misc., 154).*

Cayuga Nation v. Land Commissioners, reversed, (152 A. D., 543).*
Cayuga Nation v. Land Commissioners, reversal affirmed (207 N. Y., 42).*
Cayuga Nation v. State (99 N. Y., 235).

Pharoh v. Benson (69 Misc., 241).*

Montauk.

Montauk Tribe v. Long Island R. R. Co. (28 A. D., 470).
Johnson v. Long Island R. R. Co. (162 N. Y., 462).

St. Regis.

Terrance v. Crowly (62 Misc., 138).*
St. Regis Indians v. Drum (19 John., 127).

Seneca.

Seneca Nation v. Jimeson (62 Misc., 91).
Silverheels v. Maybee (82 Misc., 48).
Seneca Nation v. Christie (49 Hun., 524)*.
Seneca Nation v. Christie (126 N. Y., 122)*.
Seneca Nation v. Christie (162 U. S., 284).
Seneca Nation v. Appleby (127 A. D., 770)*.
Seneca Nation v. Appleby (196 N. Y., 318).
Dole v. Irish (2 Barb., 639).

Jemison v. Pierce (78 A. D., 9).
Shongo v. Miller et al. (45 A. D., 339).
Ryan v. Knorr (19 Hun., 540).

Seneca Nation v. Lehly (55 Hun., 83).
Jones v. Gordon et al. (51 Misc., 305).
Jimeson v. Lehly (51 Misc., 352).
Jemmison v. Kennedy (55 Hun., 47).

Buffalo, etc., Ry. Co. v. Lowry (75 Hun., 396).
Crouse v. N. Y. & O. R. R. Co. (49 Hun., 576).
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Hill (60 Hun., 347),
Seneca Nation v. Hugaboom (132 N. Y., 493).
People v. Pierce (18 Misc., 83).

Wait v. Jemison (15 Abb. N. C., 382).

Wadsworth v. Buff. Hyd. Asso. (15 Barb., 83)*.

Strong and Gordon v. Waterman (11 Paige, 607).
Fellow v. Denniston (23 N. Y., 420).

The New York Indians (5 Wal., 761).

Many of the cases cited relate to such matters as tribal and individual property rights, tribal government and customs, inheritance, crimes, police power of the State, right of eminent domain, jurisdiction, State and Federal, etc. A rearrangement of the cases according to their respective subject matters would prove convenient. The number of cases reported, however, is not so great as to render it burdensome to find a few decisions relating to any of the points mentioned, and one case will carry cross-references to other decisions relating to the same subject matter.

JOHN R. REEVES.

COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE COST OF AN ARMOR PLANT FOR THE UNITED STATES

PURSUANT TO

A PROVISION OF AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS
FOR THE NAVAL SERVICE FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1915

FEBRUARY 26, 1915.-Referred to the Committee on Naval Affairs
and ordered to be printed

WASHINGTON

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE COST OF AN ARMOR PLANT FOR

THE UNITED STATES.

Hon. BENJAMIN R. TILLMAN, United States Senate, Chairman.

Hon. LEMUEL P. PADGETT, Member of Congress.

Rear Admiral JOSEPH STRAUSS, United States Navy.

2