Auto Financing Legislation: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-sixth Congress, First Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 57 on S. 838 ... and S. 839 ...
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - Automobile industry and trade - 815 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
able Acceptance advantage American amount antitrust auto automobile automobile financing banks believe bill borrowing capital cars Cassat Chairman charge Chrysler CHUMBRIS committee competition concerned consent decree consumer Corp corporation correct cost course customers deal Department difference Dixon economic effect fact field figures finance business finance companies financing and insurance follows Ford give GMAC Government hearings increase independent independent finance industry interest Jones LATIMER legislation letter lower manufacturers McHugh mean MILLER Misch Motors dealers offer offices operation PECK percent position practices present profit purchase question rates reason record referred result retail sell Senator CARROLL Senator Hart Senator KEFAUVER Senator O'MAHONEY situation statement subsidiary talking testified testimony Thank thing tion understand United wholesale witness YNTEMA
Page 389 - The Sherman Act was designed to be a comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade.
Page 1 - means commerce among the several States or with foreign nations, or in any Territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia, or between any such Territory and another, or between any such Territory and any State or foreign nation, or between the District of Columbia and any State or Territory or foreign nation.
Page 642 - An Act to Protect Trade and Commerce against Unlawful Restraints and Monopolies.
Page 651 - On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before me, a notary public, to me known and known to me to be the person who executed the foregoing statement, and...
Page 474 - O'Gorman & Young, Inc., v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 282 US 251.
Page 474 - And the guaranty of due process, as has often been held, demands only that the law shall not be unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious, and that the means selected shall have a real and substantial relation to the object sought to be attained. It results that a regulation valid for one sort of business, or in given circumstances, may be invalid for another sort, or for the same business under other circumstances, because the reasonableness of each regulation depends upon the relevant facts.
Page 738 - ... on the condition, agreement or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies or other commodities of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement or understanding may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.
Page 439 - For this court has held that classification 'must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis.
Page 4 - General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. Such proceedings may be by way of petition setting forth the case and praying that such violation shall be enjoined or otherwise prohibited. When the parties complained of shall have been duly notified of such petition the court shall proceed, as soon as may be, to the hearing and determination of the case; and pending such petition and before final decree, the court may at any time make such temporary restraining...