Nominations of Abe Fortas and Homer Thornberry: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session ...
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - 1284 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accused action activities agree Amendment American answer appears applied appointment Associate Attorney authority believe California called CHAIRMAN Chief Justice civil Clause committee Communist concern confession confirmed Congress consider Constitution counsel course crime criminal decided decision defendant dissenting District due process effect employees enforcement equal evidence exercise fact Federal Fifth Fourteenth Amendment give hearing held holding identification interpretation interrogation involved issue Judge judgment judicial jury Justice Fortas labor lawyer legislative letter limited majority matter means ment nomination opinion person picketing police position practice present President privilege protection provisions question reason record referred respect retire rule Senator Ervin Senator THURMOND serve statement statute supra Supreme Court thing Thornberry tion trial union United violation vote witness York
Page 254 - Rather, they must look to the "traditions and [collective] conscience of our people" to determine whether a principle is "so rooted [there] ... as to be ranked as fundamental." Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 US 97, 105. The inquiry is whether a right involved "is of such a character that it cannot be denied without violating those 'fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions' . . . .
Page 824 - That this right shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice...
Page 924 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same...
Page 689 - Shelton v. Tucker. 364 US 479. 488 (1960): "In a series of decisions this Court has held that, even though the governmental purpose be legitimate and substantial, that purpose cannot be pursued by means that broadly stifle fundamental personal liberties when the end can be more narrowly achieved.
Page 767 - That the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage, according to the course of that law.
Page 265 - There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not: The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.
Page 465 - Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion. The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
Page 1011 - They reach farther than the concrete form of the case then before the court, with its adventitious circumstances ; they apply to all invasions on the part of the government and its employees of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.