 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1887 - 812 pages
...this : to consider whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 734 pages
...order to be valid, must be only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the party in ftvor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. This is the principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman,... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 690 pages
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public." Brewer v. Marshall, 4 CE Or. 587. See, also, reference to other cases to same... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - Civil procedure - 1837 - 524 pages
...the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - Law reports, digests, etc - 1837 - 886 pages
...the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
 | Law - 1839 - 474 pages
...should be coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
| |
We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large... 
