And in Co. Litt. 352 b., among r*og5 the rules laid down respecting estoppels, are these — " Secondly, that ^ "' every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and not to be taken by argument or inference. The Central Law Journal - Page 1321882Full view - About this book
| New Jersey. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1835 - 836 pages
...chargeable with any such absurdity. It is laid down by Lord Coke, that every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and not be taken by argument or inference, Coke Littleton 352, 6. If we apply this reasonable rule of the common... | |
| Richard Preston - Abstracts of title - 1818 - 486 pages
...ought to be reciprocal, that is, to bind both parties. 2dly, Every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every...intent, and not to be taken by argument or inference. The rule is applicable to recitals and pleading. 3dly, Every estoppel ought to be a precise affirmation... | |
| Sandford Nevile, Sir William Montagu Manning - Law reports, digests, etc - 1835 - 1004 pages
...Palmer v. Ekiiis (a). In Co. Lict. 352 b., it is said (4) that every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every...intent and not to be taken by argument or inference," and (third rule) " every estoppel ought to be a precise affirmation of that which maketh the estoppel,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - Law reports, digests, etc - 1836 - 900 pages
...laid down respecting estoppels "~ are these — " Secondly, that every estoppel, because it against concluded! a man to allege the truth, must be certain...intent, and not to be taken by argument or inference. Thirdly, every estoppel ought to be a precise affirmation of that which maketh the estoppel, and not... | |
| Sir Edward Coke, John Henry Thomas - Land tenure - 1836 - 772 pages
...187. S'u's'tbfcer- (°) Secondly, that every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to tain to every allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and not to be taken MSÏ'É 4 4 by argument or inference. 23 Ass. 14. 17 H. 6. Estop. 273. 18 E. 3. 30. 7 H. 7. 6 1 16.... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Great Britain. Court of Queen's Bench, Thomas Flower Ellis - Law reports, digests, etc - 1843 - 1182 pages
...that defendant was indebted &c. ; as in Palmer v. Temple (c}. " Every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every...intent, and not to be taken by argument or inference;" Co. Litt. 352 b. : and, in the same place, it is said : (a) Bob. 206. 207. Sth ed. (6) 2 B. fr Aid.... | |
| William Carpmael - Law reports, digests, etc - 1843 - 778 pages
...rules laid down respecting estoppels are these : — " 2dly, That every estoppel because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and not be taken by argument or inference. 3dly, Every estoppel ought to be a precise affirmation of that which... | |
| George Spence - Civil procedure - 1846 - 708 pages
...purporting to 460, where the general doctrines are stated. pels (a). Every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and ought to be by precise affirmation, and not to be taken by argument or inference (¿>). Lord Coke lays... | |
| Florida. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1848 - 786 pages
...because there is no reciprocity in such an estoppel. 2d. Every estoppel, because it concludeth a party to allege the truth, must be certain to every intent, and not to be taken by argument or interference. Apply this test, there is no certainty. It is all argument, and only interference. And... | |
| Great Britain. Courts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1854 - 814 pages
...down respecting estoppels, are these — " Secondly, that ^ "' every estoppel, because it concludeth a man to allege the truth, must be certain to every...intent, and not to be taken by argument or inference. Thirdly, every estoppel ought to be a precise affirmation of that which maketh the estoppel, 285] tad... | |
| |