Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 246West Publishing Company, 1966 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 439
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. Cite as 246 F.Supp . 439 ( 1965 ) held that a State cannot without its con- sent be sued in the District Court of ...
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. Cite as 246 F.Supp . 439 ( 1965 ) held that a State cannot without its con- sent be sued in the District Court of ...
Page 440
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. 1. United States 67 ( 12 ) The parties by contract cannot valid- ly enter into a binding agreement which by its ...
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. 1. United States 67 ( 12 ) The parties by contract cannot valid- ly enter into a binding agreement which by its ...
Page 547
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. Cite as 246 F.Supp . 547 ( 1965 ) Cite as 246 F.Supp . 549 ( 1965 ). 4. Petitioner is eligible for natural ...
Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations. Cite as 246 F.Supp . 547 ( 1965 ) Cite as 246 F.Supp . 549 ( 1965 ). 4. Petitioner is eligible for natural ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement alleged amended amount application arbitration attorney bank Carolina CHIEF JUDGE Cite as 246 claim Code commerce Company complaint Constitution contract Corp corporation counsel County damages decision defendant defendant's denied determination dismiss District Court District Judge employees entitled error coram nobis evidence F.Supp fact federal court fendant filed Fourteenth Amendment Government Grand Jury granted habeas corpus held income tax infringement interest Internal Revenue issue Jones Act jurisdiction KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Labor Laino legislative liability ment motion north of ranges parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff plea prior prior art Procedure purposes question reason relator relief rule S.Ct Section Sherman Anti-Trust Act sion South Carolina statute suit summary judgment supra Supreme Court taxpayer Tennessee Valley Authority tiff tion townships one hundred trial United States District valid violation waiver York