Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1935
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Southwestern Brick Cases 107 I C C 681
34
Abilene S Ry Co Armstrong Packing Co et al 393
39
St Louis Cupples Station Terminal Regulations 40 I C C
40
Gross Co v Lehigh Valley R Co 198 I C C 397 248
42
Dallas Paper Co v Arkansas L M Ry Co 148 I C C 787 564
43
Ore Traffic Pooling in Wisconsin and Michigan
46
Pierpont Mfg Co v Southern Ry Co 50 I C C 81
50
Building Materials Road from Snow Flake W Va 103
51
DimmittCaudleSmith Live Stock Commission Co v Chicago
55
HaleyNeeley Co v Ann Arbor R Co 186 I C C 299 198
58
Sawbrook Steel Castings Co v Chicago B Q R Co 261
61
Shippers Assn of Carolina Inc v Atlantic Coast Line R Co
65
Southwestern Vegetable Case 200 I C C 355
66
Armour Co v El Paso S W Co 52 I C C 240 374
67
Palmolive Co v Chicago M St P P R Co 393
71
Albers Bros Milling Co v Oregon S L R Co 156 I C C 695
72
Shreveport Chamber of Commerce on behalf ofHamilton
73
Morrell Co v New York Central R Co 104 I C C 104
76
Eastern Bituminous Coal Investigation 140 I C C 3 446
80
Sand Gravel and Crushed Stone 177 I C C 621
81
City of Marshall Ill v Pennsylvania R Co 465
84
Mead Johnson Co v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 171 I C C 5
88
Baltimore O R Co
106
Eastern Lime Mfrs Traffic Bureau v Akron B B R Co
107
Brick and Clay Products in the South 113 I C C 380 155
113
Paper Newsprint from Jonquierre Quebec 686
115
Spencer Kellog Sons v United States 20 Fed 20 459 380
117
Eastern Ohio Coal Operators Assn v Ashland C I Ry Co
126
Scrap Iron and Scrap Steel 182 I C C 175 717
129
Muscle Shoals Traffic Bureau v Abilene S Ry Co
140
Krupp Foundry Co o Southern Ry Co 148 I C C 743
148
National Mortar Supply Co 0 Ann Arbor R Co
152
Eastern Shore of Virginia Prod Exc v New York P N
156
Alexandria Refining Co v Missouri Pac R Co 112 I C C 613
159
Emsco Steel Products Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
163
Pocahontas Tanning Co v Chesapeake 0 Ry Co
167
Lake Cargo Coal 139 I C C 367
168
Simonins Sons Inc v Cincinnati I W R Co 393
175
Leonard Crosset Riley 0 Akron C Y Ry Co
176
Brick and Related Articles 188 I C C 147
188
Olds Whipple Inc o New York N H H R Co
194
Bush Terminal R Co Bedford Pulp Paper Co v
195
Clicquot Club Co v New York N H H R Co
203
Allen Mfg Co v Louisville N R Co 192 I C C 170
208
Wells Trustee v Alton R Co
209
East Tennessee Sand Gravel Co v Southern Ry Co 192
211
Ashland Fire Brick Co v Southern Ry Co 22 I C C 115
213
Morgans L T R S S Co 35 I C C 492 531
238
Agricultural Limestone to Lower Michigan 739
248
El Dorado Chamber of Commerce v Chicago R I P
251
R W Burch Inc v Railway Express Agency Inc 190 I C C
253
Sawbrook Steel Castings Co v Chicago B Q R Co 188
261
Cadillac Malleable Iron Co v Ann Arbor R Co
263
Penn Veneer Co v Pennsylvania R Co 768
275
Y Ry Co Arkansas Cotton Seed Crushers
287
Porter Oil Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 172 I C C 407
295
Alliance Motor Co v Chicago B Q R Co 196 I C C 408
296
Coal from Illinois Indiana and Kentucky
305
Brick between Points in Official Territory 192 I C C 787
310
National Paving Brick Mfrs Assn v Alabama V Ry Co
311
Coal Producers Assn of Pittsburgh v Ashland C I Ry Co 456
314
Procter Gamble Co v Baltimore 0 R Co 153 I C C
329
Assigned Cars for Bituminous Coal Mines 80 I C C 520
372
Meats and PackingHouse Products 136 I C C 651 78
374
Coltexo Corp v Atchison T S F Ry Co 227
387
Alabama N W R Co National Cottonseed Products
393
Classification Exceptions on Linseed Oil 74 I C C 155
400
Proportional Rates to Ohio River Crossings 43 I C C 458
404
Shaw Bros v Apache Ry Co 179 I C C 734 744
409
Plate Glass from to and between Points in Southern Territory
421
United States v American Ry Exp Co 265 U S
425
Merchants Mfrs Traffic Bureau v Arkansas L M
431
Atchison Chamber of Commerce v Union Pac R Co 196
442
Union Pac R Co 136 I C C 447 148 I C C
444
State of New Hampshire v Baltimore O R Co
445
Atlanta B C R Co and Atlantic Coast Line R Co
453
Steel and Iron fromCentral Freight Association to Western
471
Boston A R 139 I C C 88 211 385
472
National Slag Co v Atlantic City R Co 181 I C C 699 385
477
Smoot Sand Gravel Corp v Baltimore 0 R Co 174
483
22
489
Co Salis ta Litopo
490
Aberdeen R R Co 153 I C C 239
496
South Carolina Asparagus G Assn v Southern Ry Co 64
500
Burch Inc v Railway Exp Agency Inc 190 I C C 520
520
Northern Hemlock Hardwood Mfrs Assn v Ann Arbor
521
Alabama G S R Co Chamber of Commerce Selma Ala
523
Livestock Southern Territory Rates 171 I C C 721 524 634
524
Estimated Weights on Horses and Mules 91 I C C 215
527
Combination Rule on Sand Gravel and Stone 112 I C C 231 82
529
Hammond Standish Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 183
533
C N Y Canal Co 271 Fed 877
533
Quintal Lynch v Florida East Coast Ry Co 57 I C C 289
533
Loading and Unloading Carload Freight 101 I C C 394
549
Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce v Atchison T S F
555
Commodity Rates on Lumber and Other Forest Products 165
562
Great Northern Ry Co 21 I C C 558 167 435
565
Chert Clay Sand and Gravel 122 I C C 133 140 I C C
566
Handling Charges at Louisiana Ports 61 I C C 379
571
Calliari Bros 0 Ann Arbor R Co 198 I C C 388 618
573
In the Matter of Application of Union Belt of Detroit et al
577
Operation by Union Belt of Detroit 131 I C C 384
578
Atchison T S F Ry Co v Kansas City Stock Yards Co
582
Southeastern Vegetable Case 200 I C C 273 44 63 69
592
H Willard v Atchison T S F Ry Co
595
Concho Livestock Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 178
596
Van Dusen Harrington Co v Northern Pac Ry Co 32
600
Reduced Rates from New York Piers 81 I C C 312
601
ISSISSIPPI Memphis to Mississippi
605
Allison Co v Norfolk S R Co 191 I C C 457 236
609
Reduced Rates 1922 68 I C C 676
611
Cotton Wastes from to and between Points in the South
617
Cargill Commission Co v Great Northern Ry Co 191 I C C
618
Atlantic City R Co Washington Building Lime
624
Fargo N Dak Chamber of Commerce v Akron C Y
625
Farm Seed Assn of North America v Atchison T S F
626
Hansen Packing Co v Baltimore O R Co 196 I C C 722 75
631
Fifteen Per Cent Case 1931 179 I C C 215 191 I C C 361 192
634
American Sand Gravel Co v Chicago N W Ry Co
637
No 15137
639
Atlantic Coast Line R Co and Atlanta B C R Co
645
Atlantic Coast Line R Co r Standard Oil Co 275 U
651
Richmond F P R Co Excess Income 170 I C C 451
657
Anderson 225 U S 436
668
Fredonia Linseed Oil Works Co v Alabama V Ry Co 146
679
Blackmer Post Pipe Co v Wabash Ry Co 161 I C C 74
697
Canadian National Ry Co Application for Approval of
699
No 15165_ 103
708
Cars Refrigerator Use of Privately owned 323
715
No 15210
719
Cement fromLimedale Mitchell and Speeds Ind
724
No 15435 etc 314
727
686
731
No 15493
739
Texas Pacific Ry Co v United States 289 U S 627 47 170 213
753
Lumberfrom Fayette Ala 197 I C C 418 462
753
Central R Co of New Jersey Best Foods Inc v 393
761
I C C 5
764
Iron City Produce Co Inc v Atlantic Coast Line R Co 235
765
Vineland Farmers Exc v Pennsylvania R Co 190 I C C
771
Hay between Points in Tex La and Ark 126 I C C 524
782
Cranfill Bros Drilling Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 253
791
Consolidated Stone Cases 200 I C C 65 282
799
Miner Lbr Co v Pennsylvania R Co 161 I C C 801
801
Construction of Lines in Eastern Oregon 138 I C C 99 11
802
Lone Star Cement Co Ala v Atchison T S F Ry Co 225
804
SalisburySatterleeWay Co v
827
Petroleum and Its Products 171 1 0 0 980 1701 00 037 28 160
829
Louisville N R Co Alabama Cotton Seed Crushers
830
Moon Co Inc v Seaboard Air Line Ry Co 179 I C C 185 61
831
Morrell Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
833
Fox Sons Co v Cleveland C C St L Ry Co 498
834
Central West Coal Co v Baltimore 0 R Co 271
835
Fredonia Linseed Oil Works Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 40
836
699
837
Freight Handling Charges at St Louis Stations 543
839
Blue Ridge Glass Corp v Akron B B R Co 176 I C C
840
Albuquerque Oil Gasoline Co Inc v Atchison T S
851
Kimball Colwell Co v Baltimore O R Co 390
867
292
868
445
874
Bags Used to Memphis Tenn 307
876
Louisville Live Stock Exc v Akron C Y Ry Co 390
Fruits and Vegetables Switching at Baltimore Md 689
Lebanon Steel Foundry v Pennsylvania R Co 257
Mayor of Revere Mass v Boston M R 131
Globe Grain Milling Co v Southern Pac Co 186 I C C
Baltimore E R Co Washington Building Lime 467

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 511 - ... than it charges, demands, collects or receives from any other person or persons for doing for him or them a like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, such common carrier shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
Page 280 - If the owner of property transported under this Act directly or indirectly renders any service connected with such transportation, or furnishes any instrumentality used therein, the charge and allowance therefor shall be no more than is just and reasonable, and the Commission may, after hearing on a complaint...
Page 330 - While the statements of the law thus relied upon are satisfactory in the connection in which they were used, they have been plainly and repeatedly held not applicable where stock ownership has been resorted to, not for the purpose of participating in the affairs of a corporation in the normal and usual manner, but for the purpose, as in this case, of controlling a subsidiary company so that it may be used as a mere agency or instrumentality of the owning company or companies.
Page 330 - In such a case the courts will not permit themselves to be blinded or deceived by mere forms or law but, regardless of fictions, will deal with the substance of the transaction involved as if the corporate agency did not exist and as the justice of the case may require.
Page 280 - ... therein, the charge and allowance therefor shall be no more than is just and reasonable, and the commission may, after hearing on a complaint or on its own initiative, determine what is a reasonable charge as the maximum to be paid by the carrier or carriers for the services so rendered or for the use of the instrumentality so furnished, and fix the same by appropriate order, which order shall have the same force and effect and be enforced in like manner as the orders above provided for under...
Page 384 - For neither through billing, uninterrupted movement, continuous possession by the carrier, nor unbroken bulk, is an essential of a through interstate shipment. These are common incidents of a through shipment; and when the intention with which a shipment was made is in issue, the presence, or absence, of one or all of these incidents may be important evidence bearing upon that question.
Page 566 - It is the right of the public to use the road's facilities and to demand service of it rather than the extent of its business which is the real criterion determinative of its character.
Page 440 - Provided, however, that authority to issue said stock is granted upon the express condition, that. for the purposes of the accounting, as provided in the classification of investment in road and equipment in the text of account 41,
Page 330 - Interstate commerce the products of such mining company, yet where such ownership of stock is resorted to, not for the purpose of participating In the affairs of the corporation in which it is held in a manner normal and usual with stockholders, but for the purpose of making It a mere agent, or instrumentality or department of another company...
Page 470 - The cause of action in respect of a shipment of property shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to accrue upon delivery or tender of delivery thereof by the carrier, and not after.

Bibliographic information