 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - Civil law - 1862 - 550 pages
...Cont., §§ 635, 636, 660. § 598. In case of uncertainty not removed by the preceding rules, language should be interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist.1 whom. 'Code La., 1952. 1953. See Harper v. NY City Ins. Co., 22 NT, 441 ; Marvin t>. Stone,... | |
 | California, California. Commission to Revise the Laws of California - California - 1871 - 894 pages
...to tw taken most stipulation when implied . NcroHHary incidents implied. NYCC, Sec. 818. SEC. 1(554. In cases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding...against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. The promiser is presumed to be such party; except in a contract between a public officer or body, as... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1872 - 728 pages
...uncertainty not removed by the bo taken nuwt preceding rules, the language of a contract should be wITo'm? interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. The promisor is presumed to be such party; except in a contract between a public officer or body, as... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 626 pages
...inconsistent with its nature, or with the main intention of the parties, are to be rejected. § 1664. In eases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding rules,...against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. The promisor is presumed to be such party; except in a contract between a public officer or body, as... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 624 pages
...inconsistent with its nature, or with the main intention of the parties, are to be rejected. § 1654. In cases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding...interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertamty to exist. The promisor is presumed to be such party ; except in a contract between a public... | |
 | California - Civil law - 1876 - 612 pages
...inconsistent with its nature, or with the main intention of the parties, are to be rejected. § 1654. In cases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding...be interpreted most strongly against the party who cansed the uncertainty W exist. The promisor is presumed to be such party ; except in a contract between... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1200 pages
...First, the said contract of sale was prepared by Lilienthal, and neither Ruffin, nor any legal advisor of his, had anything to do with its preparation. "In...against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist." Section 1654, Civil Code; Lassing v. James, 107 Gal. 348, 40 Рас, 534. [3, 4] Second, it must be... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1148 pages
...believed at the time of maJiing it that the promisee understood it." Section 1654 déchires: "In case of uncertainty not removed by the preceding rules,...against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. The promisor is presumed to be such party." In furtherance of this presumption, it is here positively... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1172 pages
...favor of the grantee, and section 1054 providing that, in cases of uncertainty not removed by certain rules, the language of a contract should be interpreted...against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Deeds, Cent. Dig. §§ 310, 331 ; Dec. Dig. § 114.*] 2. HUSBAND... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 1228 pages
...the other consideration suggested by appellants that, if there be any uncertainty in the language, it should be interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist, that is, the contractor, who fits the position both of promisor and the person who prepared the contract.... | |
| |
In cases of uncertainty not removed by the preceding rules, the language of a contract should be interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. 
