Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5H.M. Stationery Office, 1928 - Bills, Legislative |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page iii
... STATEMENT OF EXCESS . A STATEMENT of the Sum required to be Voted in order to make good an EXCESS on the GRANT for BEET SUGAR SUBSIDY , GREAT BRITAIN , for the Year ended 31st March , 1927 . Twenty - five Thousand Eight Hundred and ...
... STATEMENT OF EXCESS . A STATEMENT of the Sum required to be Voted in order to make good an EXCESS on the GRANT for BEET SUGAR SUBSIDY , GREAT BRITAIN , for the Year ended 31st March , 1927 . Twenty - five Thousand Eight Hundred and ...
Page xv
... Statement of Excess on the Vote for the Beet Sugar Subsidy , 1926 , was considered . The Revenue Departments Appropriation Accounts and the Civil Ser- vices Appropriation Accounts , 1926 , were considered . Sir Malcolm Ramsay , K.C.B. ...
... Statement of Excess on the Vote for the Beet Sugar Subsidy , 1926 , was considered . The Revenue Departments Appropriation Accounts and the Civil Ser- vices Appropriation Accounts , 1926 , were considered . Sir Malcolm Ramsay , K.C.B. ...
Page 9
... statement about those rules . So far as the Treasury are concerned , we agree on the practical point with the Audit Office . We think this is an exceptional class of case which the Inland Revenue ought to pick out and submit separately ...
... statement about those rules . So far as the Treasury are concerned , we agree on the practical point with the Audit Office . We think this is an exceptional class of case which the Inland Revenue ought to pick out and submit separately ...
Page 11
... statement of the fact to say that the amount of duty in assess- ment but unpaid at 31st March , 1927 , was £ 95,000,000 . Would it not be more accurate to indicate in that paragraph that that sum of £ 95,000,000 was a claim which has ...
... statement of the fact to say that the amount of duty in assess- ment but unpaid at 31st March , 1927 , was £ 95,000,000 . Would it not be more accurate to indicate in that paragraph that that sum of £ 95,000,000 was a claim which has ...
Page 14
... way to give rather more information than appears in this statement , because if you compare one or two cases together one gathers the impression that it is quite impossible to see 14 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
... way to give rather more information than appears in this statement , because if you compare one or two cases together one gathers the impression that it is quite impossible to see 14 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
A. E. WATSON actual Admiralty Air Ministry allowance amount Appendix Board Briggs buildings Captain Crookshank cent Chairman charge Claud Schuster Committee Continued contract cost course deal Department Ellis Empire Marketing Board estimate Exchequer expenditure expenses FABIAN WARE fact fees figure firm Fund George Chrystal Gillett going Government grant House increase Labour loans loss Major Salmon matter Members ment mittee paid paragraph payment pensions Pethick-Lawrence Phillips Police Post Office profit purchase question receipts reference regard to Subhead Report Revenue Roy Wilson salaries Scotland Sir Assheton Pownall Sir Ernest Gowers Sir HENRY BUNBURY Sir Herbert Creedy Sir John Marriott Sir Lionel Earle Sir Malcolm Ramsay Sir Oswyn Murray Sir Robert Hamilton Sir SIGMUND DANNREUTHER Sir Walter Nicholson staff thing tion Treasury Vote Walter Baker War Office Waterfield whole WILLIAM GRAHAM