What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acquired action of ejectment actual adverse possession alleged allowed appeared apply authority Barb brought Brown character cited City claim claimant co-tenant color of title common considered constitute constructive continued contract damages Davis decided deed defendant demand distinction easement effect entered entitled entry equity established estoppel evidence execution exist fact founded give grant held hold improvements interest issue Jackson Johns Jones judgment jurisdiction jury land landlord lease limitations maintain Mass matter ment mesne profits Miss mortgagee nature necessary notice occupant ouster owner party Penn person plaintiff pleading practice premises principle proceedings proof proved purchase question real actions reason receiver recover recovery remedy rents rule Smith statute sufficient suit Supreme Court tenant term tion trespass trial true United verdict Wall Wend writ York
Page 729 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 742 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Page 754 - ... where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
Page 665 - While the different nations of Europe respected the right of the natives, as occupants, they asserted the ultimate dominion to be in themselves ; and claimed and exercised, as a consequence of this ultimate dominion, a power to grant the soil, while yet in possession of the natives. These grants have been understood by all to convey a title to the grantees, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy.
Page 87 - Would the owner of the property, in an action of ejectment brought by the adverse party, founded upon the deed, be required to offer evidence to defeat a recovery? If such proof would be necessary, the cloud would exist; if the proof would be unnecessary, no shade would be cast Dy the presence of the deed.
Page 548 - A mere intruder cannot enter on a person actually seized, and eject him, and then question his title, or set up an outstanding title in another. The maxim that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's, is applicable to all actions for the recovery of property.
Page 163 - It is inherent in the nature of sovereignty, not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent. This is the general sense, and the general practice of mankind ; and the exemption, as one of the attributes of sovereignty, is now enjoyed by the government of every state in the union.
Page 169 - Another consideration is, that since the United States cannot be made a defendant to a suit concerning its property, and no judgment in any suit against an individual who has possession or control of such property can bind or conclude the government, as is decided by this court in the case of Carr v.