Cases Determined in the St. Louis and the Kansas City Courts of Appeals of the State of Missouri, Volume 136E. W. Stephens., 1909 - Law reports, digests, etc |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abstract AFFIRMED agent alleged amended amount assessment Bank bill of exceptions cause of action charge Chillicothe circuit court Circuit Court.-Hon claim common law concur contract contributory negligence Court of Appeals damages deed defendant defendant's demurrer dence dramshop duty Ency engine error evidence ex rel fact fendant filed fraud Grand Lodge held hogs injury instruction number Insurance interpleader issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kansas City Court land liable Lincoln county Louis March 29 matter ment misjoinder Missouri motion negligence non est factum notice Option Law paid partnership party person petition Pettis County Pike county plaintiff plaintiff in error pleaded Potter probate court question Railroad Railway reason record recover respondent reversed Revised Statutes 1899 rule servant street sufficient suit taxbills term testimony thereof tiff tion track trial court verdict wife witness
Popular passages
Page 94 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded...
Page 253 - ... execute and deposit as security for the notes, and that defendants failed to perform that agreement. Afterwards the lots were sold under the deed of trust. It Is conceded that, though NB Winfrey was made the payee of the second note, he had no real Interest In the transaction, but was acting for plaintiff. The burden of proof was on the defendants to show that the notes were not delivered to plaintiff, but were wrongfully obtained by him from the bank, and that they were unsupported by a sufficient...
Page 267 - At the trial, plaintiff took a nonsuit with leave to move to set the same aside and after her motion was overruled, brought the case here by appeal.
Page 99 - community of right," or of " interest in the subject-matter," among these individuals, but where there is and because there is merely a community of interest among them in the questions of law and fact involved in the general controversy, or in the kind and form of relief demanded and obtained by or against each individual member of the numerous body.