 No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Page 488by Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, William Jennison, Elijah W. Meddaugh, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, Hovey K. Clarke, John Adams Brooks, William Dudley Fuller, James M. Reasoner, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper - 1868Full view - About this book
 | Virginia. General Assembly. House of Delegates - Virginia - 1898 - 850 pages
...in my opinion, the fifteenth section of article 5 of the Constitution of Virginia, which expressly declares that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in the title." In addition to the powers already enumerated, this company is authorized to unite, merge... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1837 - 696 pages
...obligation of that which had been previously granted to the complainants; and that, consequently, it is in conflict with that provision of the constitution which declares, that no " state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." In the investigation of this case,... | |
 | Michigan - Constitutions - 1850 - 40 pages
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal ยง 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - Constitutional amendments - 1850 - 990 pages
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - Virginia - 1851 - 1348 pages
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 788 pages
...in behalf of the people, that the act is unconetitutioual for two reasons: First That it conflicts with that provision of the Constitution which declares...law shall embrace more than one object, which shall bj expressed in its title. It is urged that the object of a city charter is to provide for the government... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 806 pages
...Justice COOLEY, in People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481, 495, in speaking of the constitutional provision which declares that "no law shall embrace more than...one object, which shall be expressed in its title" (section 20, art. 4, Constitution of 1850, and section 21, art. 5, Constitution of 1909), said: "But... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 804 pages
...therefore in conflict with section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of this State, which provides that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. " We think this contention sufficiently answered by what was said by this court in Soukup v. Van Dyke,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1886 - 744 pages
...Court upon four grounds, namely : First. That it is in conflict with the provision of the Constitution that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Second. That it violates another provision of the Constitution, to wit : " No law shall be revised,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 776 pages
...on exceptions. It is claimed that under section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title," this section is invalid and void. The title to act 259, Laws 1881, reads : " An act to regulate the... | |
| |
