Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
-I mean whatever is in the Kalendar . I am assuming it is there as a correct record . 36. And only one in 1921 , 1922 , and 1926 ? That is right . had 37. Although there been six vacancies in two years for these very im- portant ...
-I mean whatever is in the Kalendar . I am assuming it is there as a correct record . 36. And only one in 1921 , 1922 , and 1926 ? That is right . had 37. Although there been six vacancies in two years for these very im- portant ...
Page 14
Then the next thing is that I think in principle this registration is agreed amongst all architects - I mean there may be one or two exceptions ? — Yes , and the House has endorsed it too . 49. One of the objects of this Bill is to ...
Then the next thing is that I think in principle this registration is agreed amongst all architects - I mean there may be one or two exceptions ? — Yes , and the House has endorsed it too . 49. One of the objects of this Bill is to ...
Page 16
... the term Registered " Archi- tect somebody who would be entitled to be registered and does not apply , is he going to get into trouble under this Bill ? -We were suggesting there might be 5 years ; that would mean the publication of ...
... the term Registered " Archi- tect somebody who would be entitled to be registered and does not apply , is he going to get into trouble under this Bill ? -We were suggesting there might be 5 years ; that would mean the publication of ...
Page 25
Of course on the general question as to whether in a Registration Bill the control of registra- tion will be mainly in the hands of the profession registered , that of course it seems to me must be the case . I mean , architects must ...
Of course on the general question as to whether in a Registration Bill the control of registra- tion will be mainly in the hands of the profession registered , that of course it seems to me must be the case . I mean , architects must ...
Page 42
Thank you very much for it any advantage of that kind or one coming again to - day , Major Barnes . that it would not have under any scheme . am afraid we are trespassing upon your I mean , a body that is numerically , by time a great ...
Thank you very much for it any advantage of that kind or one coming again to - day , Major Barnes . that it would not have under any scheme . am afraid we are trespassing upon your I mean , a body that is numerically , by time a great ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed Albert Alexander Amendment appeal apply architectural Association authority Ayes Barnes Bill Board body British Architects building called Captain Waterhouse Chairman charge Clause Colonel Applin Colonel Day Colonel Wedgwood Committee divided consider Continued contract cost Council County course Court Crown Lands deal Engineers Estimates examination fact further give given Government guardians Herbert Williams House Institute of British interests land leave Lieut.-Colonel James London Lord Warrington Major March matter mean move Noes objection Office passed person Poor Law practice present proposed provisions Question Question put reason referred regard registered Repealed Report respect Robert Morrison Royal Institute Sir Burton Chadwick Sir Charles Cayzer Sir Frank Nelson Sir Frederick Sir Philip Cunliffe-Lister Smith-Carington staff stand suggest thing tion union Vernon Davies Viscount Sandon whole
Bibliographic information
| Title | Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
| Author | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons |
| Publisher | H.M. Stationery Office, 1927 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |