Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
Now it might perhaps interest all our witnesses to know at once , whether or not the Royal Institute of * See Appendix 1 . British Architects is prepared to accept the term 66 Registered Architect " in the place of the term " Architect ...
Now it might perhaps interest all our witnesses to know at once , whether or not the Royal Institute of * See Appendix 1 . British Architects is prepared to accept the term 66 Registered Architect " in the place of the term " Architect ...
Page 2
... not allowed freely to use the word " Architect " and " Architectural " their interests would be interfered with . That , Sir , again will disappear if the 12 May , 1927. ] Bill is a Bill in 2 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
... not allowed freely to use the word " Architect " and " Architectural " their interests would be interfered with . That , Sir , again will disappear if the 12 May , 1927. ] Bill is a Bill in 2 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE.
Page 3
... and because the Insti- tute from the very beginning has been animated by the desire to avoid as far as they possibly could any interference with anything which might be regarded as a vested interest , or which might be regarded as ...
... and because the Insti- tute from the very beginning has been animated by the desire to avoid as far as they possibly could any interference with anything which might be regarded as a vested interest , or which might be regarded as ...
Page 15
It is solely in the interests of the public that I am asking these questions . On Tuesday , for my sins , I am Chairman of the Building Acts Committee of the London County Council , as Major Barnes knows , and I must be there to be ...
It is solely in the interests of the public that I am asking these questions . On Tuesday , for my sins , I am Chairman of the Building Acts Committee of the London County Council , as Major Barnes knows , and I must be there to be ...
Page 19
I should like to correct the impression that this Bill is put for- ward in the interests of the Institute . This Bill is put forward in the interests of architecture and the architectural pro- fession , and it is an attempt to secure ...
I should like to correct the impression that this Bill is put for- ward in the interests of the Institute . This Bill is put forward in the interests of architecture and the architectural pro- fession , and it is an attempt to secure ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed Albert Alexander Amendment appeal apply architectural Association authority Ayes Barnes Bill Board body British Architects building called Captain Waterhouse Chairman charge Clause Colonel Applin Colonel Day Colonel Wedgwood Committee divided consider Continued contract cost Council County course Court Crown Lands deal Engineers Estimates examination fact further give given Government guardians Herbert Williams House Institute of British interests land leave Lieut.-Colonel James London Lord Warrington Major March matter mean move Noes objection Office passed person Poor Law practice present proposed provisions Question Question put reason referred regard registered Repealed Report respect Robert Morrison Royal Institute Sir Burton Chadwick Sir Charles Cayzer Sir Frank Nelson Sir Frederick Sir Philip Cunliffe-Lister Smith-Carington staff stand suggest thing tion union Vernon Davies Viscount Sandon whole
Bibliographic information
| Title | Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
| Author | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons |
| Publisher | H.M. Stationery Office, 1927 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |