Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page x
brought up and read the first time as follows : 66 Nothing in this Act shall prevent a body corporate firm or part- nership from carrying on the professional business of an architect— ( a ) if the business of the body corporate firm or ...
brought up and read the first time as follows : 66 Nothing in this Act shall prevent a body corporate firm or part- nership from carrying on the professional business of an architect— ( a ) if the business of the body corporate firm or ...
Page xi
( Sir Clement Kinloch - Cooke ) -brought up and read the first time , as follows : " Nothing in this Act shall prevent a body corporate firm or part- nership from carrying on the professional business of a registered architect- ( a ) if ...
( Sir Clement Kinloch - Cooke ) -brought up and read the first time , as follows : " Nothing in this Act shall prevent a body corporate firm or part- nership from carrying on the professional business of a registered architect- ( a ) if ...
Page 2
A number of words have been considered and have been suggested to the Institute from various Members of that body , words such as " Authorised , " " Recognised , " Statutory " and others , but I think I am voicing the general opinion of ...
A number of words have been considered and have been suggested to the Institute from various Members of that body , words such as " Authorised , " " Recognised , " Statutory " and others , but I think I am voicing the general opinion of ...
Page 8
Are those additions made following out the suggestion that I made in my speech on the Bill , that other bodies would be accepted ? -Yes , those do follow on that . Then in line 23 after the word of " the words " and to be nominated by ...
Are those additions made following out the suggestion that I made in my speech on the Bill , that other bodies would be accepted ? -Yes , those do follow on that . Then in line 23 after the word of " the words " and to be nominated by ...
Page 9
At the moment there is none proposed in the Schedule , but references to that body , I think , were made in the Second Reading debate , and it would be entirely in keeping with the ideas which have controlled the construction of the ...
At the moment there is none proposed in the Schedule , but references to that body , I think , were made in the Second Reading debate , and it would be entirely in keeping with the ideas which have controlled the construction of the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed Albert Alexander Amendment appeal apply architectural Association authority Ayes Barnes Bill Board body British Architects building called Captain Waterhouse Chairman charge Clause Colonel Applin Colonel Day Colonel Wedgwood Committee divided consider Continued contract cost Council County course Court Crown Lands deal Engineers Estimates examination fact further give given Government guardians Herbert Williams House Institute of British interests land leave Lieut.-Colonel James London Lord Warrington Major March matter mean move Noes objection Office passed person Poor Law practice present proposed provisions Question Question put reason referred regard registered Repealed Report respect Robert Morrison Royal Institute Sir Burton Chadwick Sir Charles Cayzer Sir Frank Nelson Sir Frederick Sir Philip Cunliffe-Lister Smith-Carington staff stand suggest thing tion union Vernon Davies Viscount Sandon whole
Bibliographic information
| Title | Parliamentary Papers, Volume 5 |
| Author | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons |
| Publisher | H.M. Stationery Office, 1927 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |