Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volumes 82-85

Front Cover
First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose.
 

Contents

Mod 231
30
223
30
Shinn McLellan v
31
493
32
United States
44
Lawrason 5 Pet 495
44
Apollon The 9 Wheat 371 373 439
45
Valley Railroad Homestead Company v
51
Archers Case 1 Coke
67
Munroe 7 Cr 242 270 91 833
73
Birmingham Water W Co 11
74
440
75
New York Miller v
81
Morehouse Hemp 184
89
Cherokee Tobacco The 11 Wall 619
90
Kelsey 100 Mass 561
97
Armstrongs Foundry 6 Wall 769
104
Maine State of v Peck 53 Me 284
105
N F R Co 10 How Pr 487 287
114
Nock Philp v
115
Carpenter 2 Whart 361
120
Walcott 4 Mod 396
122
Ohio 5 How 429 432
131
Reading C R Co 52 Pa
140
Micou 18 Wall
156
Babin 19 How 271 278 44 175
175
Norton Graham Auditor v
177
People 32 N Y 239 885 887 Meyers v Field 37 Mo 434
181
Clark 18 Cal 537
182
Monaghan 23 N Y 541 360
194
Jones 11 Ill 300
208
De La Tour 2 El Bl 678 111
212
Madison 1 Cr 137175 498 610
214
425
221
Tomlinson v Branch
224
Padelford 10 Mass
236
Amer Ins Co 4 Allen 96
240
Marine Ins Co v Hodgson 7 Cr 336 742
250
Wingfield Cro Car
251
Lessee v Marckel 2 Ohio
263
850
270
Ellicott Taney C C 233
282
N F R Co 10 How Pr 487
287
Spain
291
Van Buskirk United States v
303
Hale 3 Nat B Reg 85
306
441
314
Lestapies v Ingraham 5 Pa 71
315
Hine The v Trevor 4 Wall 555 114
322
369
323
574
325
586
326
Longworth 7 Ohio 2 Pt 232
327
Williams
329
Lucas
334
488
339
Burr 13 Cal
343
N Eng Screw Co 23 How 432
352
Reynolds Trustee
357
Ohio Town of v Marcy
360
The Queen 7 Q B 795
361
Delancy 5 Cr 22
366
Williamson Knode v
372
Chusan The Story 456
373
Massachusetts Gen Hos v State Ins
381
546
382
Supervisors of Fond du Lac Co
382
Winsor 1 Clif 505
382
Cin H Day R v Pontius 19 Ohio
382
884
382
Mobile
382
877 887
382
Mohawk H R 18 Wend 1 388
382
Willard 4 Johns 43
382
338
382
The Sea Gull 2 Law Times 15 372
382
Otoe County C B Q R Co v
382
Dibbin 2 Q B 661
383
438
385
360
399
Hiatts 15 Wall 182 184 766
419
Livingston v Livingston 4 Johns Ch 290 585
424
Old Nat Bank 3 Cliff
429
Erie R Co 19 Ohio St 260
436
Savings Institution
440
Mansfield 1 Hogan 234
448
Howe 24 How 451 460 297
451
Hitchcock 6 Hill 16
460
Morrish 21 How 346 364
461
Morgan v N Y A R 10 Paige 290 287
471
Lamson 9 Wall
477
Pennington 1 Paige 102
482
Springfield 17 Ill 145
483
Ware St Paul Water Co v
487
City Bank of Balt v Smith 3 Gill
493
Supervisors 41 Ill
495
Marine Ins Co v Hodgson 7 Cr 336 742
499
104
511
Allen 2 Dall 102
512
N Y 15 Wall 478
516
Warner v
517
Buckley v Wells 33 N Y
520
Washington University of Mo v Finch 818
525
United States 17 How 558 839
528
Wilson v The Cayuga
534
N Jer S Nav Co 1 Story
537
290
590
Tweeds Case
594
Packet Co N W Union v McCue Admrx 705
596
Collector 6 Wall 499
599
Page Galpin v
602
555
604
Rochester 28 N Y 631
609
Blake 6 Man Gr 925
616
N J Cen R 3 Vroom 407
617
161
617
Banks 2 How 73
617
Phoenix Mut L Ins
617
Osbornes 9 Wall 574
617
Holbert 14 Tex 202
617
Miller 2 Paige 78
617
Strayhorn 65 N C 279
617
Garland Ex parte 4 Wall 333
617
Day Cro Eliz 313
617
Draugh
617
Strong 3 Paige 440
617
Hogsheads of Sugar v Boyle 9 Cr 195
619
Stark
627
Braden 16 How
635
Pebbling Machine Co The Woodman v
638
Erie R Co 19 Ohio St 260
639
Union Life Ins Co 2 Big Ins
663
Jennison 14 Pet 569
713
Cleveland etc R v Curran 19 Ohio
719
Muscatine 1 Wall 384 173 174 268
737
Pegues Humphrey v
743
Lafayette Ins Co v French 18 How 405 347
749
The Queen 2 Dowl L 774
750
647
750
Munson 10 Allen 491
750
Magwire v
750
Disintegrating Co 7 Blatchf
750
Schwabe 3 C B 437
750
240
750
Robertson 18 How 480
750
McCollum 4 Chand 153
750
811
750
170 174
750
215 913
750
506
750
588
750
575
750
37
750
92
750
77 2
750
791
750
425
750
Baird v
750
Massachusetts Gen Hos v State Ins
750
Augusta Bank v Augusta 49 Me 507
750
813
755
Wisdom 2 Burr
756
82
775
Virginia 6 Wheat 265 410 359
781
534
798
Goodwin 19 Wend 257
807
Lafayette Ins Co v French 18 How 405
811
S S R Co 6 Hurlst N 497
813
Gray 327
815
Howard 18 How 99
821
George The 1 Mas 27
823
Jennison 14 Pet 569
829
Hoyt 3 Wheat 246 616 954 955
834
641
839
Miller Bee 186
841
498
845
Gifford Ex parte 5 Am L Reg N S 659 888
853
441
859
La Jenne Eugenie 2 Mas 436
862
Erie R Co v
873
Our House No 2 v State 4 G Green 171 930
882
Nock
884
U S 2 Ct of Cl 224
889
Phil R R Co v
893
463
899
Brant 10 How 348 370 582
900
Horne 7 Bing 716
907
Black 18 How 475
936
538
937
Talmadge 16 How Pr 325 558
951
Combes case F Moore 759
960
875
Supervisors of Fond du Lac Co Olcott v
11
206
12
Pitt 3 Burr 1434
8
660
13
Jude 2 Bibb 60
23
290
7
647
8
938 951
Mercer Co v Hacket 1 Wall 83 173 174
Abbott 2 Story 194
U S 13 Wall 17
17
Rollo Gray v
833
Rickett 4 Hurl N 1
1
441
7
St Clair Co v Lovingston
10
Pritchard The Emily B Souder v
6
Roby
6
816
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 88 - This would restrict a general term, applicable to many objects, to one of its significations, commerce, undoubtedly, is traffic, but it is something more — it is intercourse. It describes the commercial intercourse between nations, and parts of nations, in all its branches, and is regulated by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse.
Page 382 - This enumeration of rights shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people ; and all powers, not herein delegated, remain with the people.
Page 51 - ... when the party by his own contract creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, if he may, notwithstanding any accident by inevitable necessity, because he might have provided against it by his contract.
Page 94 - Whatever subjects of this power are in their nature national, or admit only of one uniform system, or plan of regulation, may justly be said to be of such a nature as to require exclusive legislation by Congress.
Page 360 - This is an action of trespass brought by the defendant in error, against the plaintiff in error, to recover the value of certain property taken by him, in the province of Chihuahua during the late war with Mexico.
Page 382 - And all such lands so granted by this section, which shall not be sold or disposed of by said company within three years after the entire road shall have been completed, shall be subject to settlement and preemption, like other lands, at a price not exceeding one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre, to be paid to said company.
Page 328 - The result is a conviction that the states have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general government.
Page 51 - York of 1828, chap. 18, tit. 3, it was enacted that "the charter of every corporation that shall hereafter be granted by the legislature shall be subject to alteration, suspension, and repeal, in the discretion of the legislature.
Page 382 - ON a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Page 44 - ... was seized or possessed of the premises in question within five years before the commencement of the act in respect to which such action is prosecuted or defense made.

Bibliographic information