 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1891 - 700 pages
...his creditors cannot invoke the fraud to be relieved from the legal consequences of his act. 2. Parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument, and evidence of fraudulent misrepresentation as to its effect to induce its execution must... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1887 - 970 pages
..."reasonable time to cut the red cedar timber" meant. It is a familiar and well settled rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument, and that a written contract, which :s intelligible on its face, must control, the parties... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1882 - 690 pages
...evidence and instruction were in opposition to the well established rule of evidence, that parol testimony is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms, of a written contract; and, if this. had been the only effect of the evidence, its admission would have been erroneous... | |
 | Criminal law - 1904 - 646 pages
...and the corporation was signed, and in this connection our attention is called to the rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument; but this rule has no application in a criminal case. (People v. Barringer, 76 Hun, 330.)... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 978 pages
...this case it is not necessary to pursue that inquiry. Exceptions also exist to the rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument, where it appears that the instrument was not within the statute of frauds nor under seal,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1382 pages
...intended to be included in the term "pasture land." cannot be doubted. While parol contemporaneous evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument, such evidence is admissible to identify the subject-matter of the contract, when this is... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 736 pages
...this case it is not necessary to pursue that inquiry. Exceptions also exist to the rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument where it appears that the instrument was not within the statute of frauds nor under seal,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 1052 pages
...propriety of this ruling is the principal question presented by the record for our consideration. Parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the...that the defendant undertook to show that at the time Schultz executed and delivered to the bank a chattel mortgage to secure an overdraft of $175.44, and... | |
| |
Exceptions also exist to the rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the... 
