The Northeastern Reporter, Volume 30West Publishing Company, 1892 - Law Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 76
Page 15
... amount of the find- ing is excessive . The court , as we have seen , adopted as the measure of damages the amount of the debt to secure which the mortgage was given . The value of the property was proved to be greater than the amount of ...
... amount of the find- ing is excessive . The court , as we have seen , adopted as the measure of damages the amount of the debt to secure which the mortgage was given . The value of the property was proved to be greater than the amount of ...
Page 45
... amount then due from the time of demand . Cutter v , Mayor , 92 N. Y. 166 , distinguished . 2. Where there are mortgages upon land so taken , and no award is made to the mortgagees , the city should not withhold the award until sat ...
... amount then due from the time of demand . Cutter v , Mayor , 92 N. Y. 166 , distinguished . 2. Where there are mortgages upon land so taken , and no award is made to the mortgagees , the city should not withhold the award until sat ...
Page 46
... amount of the award then due . The owner at any time after the expiration of the four months may make a demand , and then commence his action to recover the amount due , and he can recover the same with interest from the time of the ...
... amount of the award then due . The owner at any time after the expiration of the four months may make a demand , and then commence his action to recover the amount due , and he can recover the same with interest from the time of the ...
Page 90
... amount , payable to defendant's order , and deliv- ered the same to her husband , Charles Hunt , who delivered it to defendant . De- fendant drew the money on it , and gave his own check for the amount to plaintiff's husband . Plaintiff ...
... amount , payable to defendant's order , and deliv- ered the same to her husband , Charles Hunt , who delivered it to defendant . De- fendant drew the money on it , and gave his own check for the amount to plaintiff's husband . Plaintiff ...
Page 91
... amount of it from the defendant , or show that this check and its proceeds actually became the property of the husband , is evident . Such a delivery is consistent with many other hypotheses , and it might have been accompanied with ...
... amount of it from the defendant , or show that this check and its proceeds actually became the property of the husband , is evident . Such a delivery is consistent with many other hypotheses , and it might have been accompanied with ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed agreement alleged amount appellate court appellee assessment assigned averred cause of action certificate charge circuit court claim complaint concur contract contributory negligence corporation costs counsel Court of Appeals creditors damages death deceased decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer duty entitled error evidence execution executors facts fendant filed fund Hazelton held husband injury instructions interest Judge judgment jury land liable lien Mass ment mortgage motion N. E. Rep N. Y. Supp negligence opinion overruled owner paid party Patrick Larkin payment person plain plaintiff plaintiff in error proceedings purchase purpose question railroad real estate reason recover reversed rule statute street subrogation Suffolk county superior court supreme court sustained taxes term testator testified thereof tiff tion Tippecanoe county town trial trust verdict wife witness York
Popular passages
Page 119 - ... any debt or demand, and from paying out, or in any way transferring or delivering, to any person, any money, property, or effects of the corporation, during the pendency of the action ; except by express permission of the court.
Page 28 - ' a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary, and concise language, without repetition, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended.
Page 347 - Exceptions also exist to the rule that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the...
Page 334 - Illinois, hereby releasing and waiving all rights under and by virtue of the Homestead Exemption Laws of this State.
Page 381 - It is furthermore hereby expressly provided, that no suit or action of any kind against said company for the recovery of any claim upon, under or by virtue of this policy, shall be sustainable in any court of law or chancery, unless such suit or action shall be commenced within the term of twelve months next after any loss or damage shall occur...
Page 26 - Now in order to maintain money had and received, it is in general incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that the defendant has money of the plaintiff which in equity and good conscience he ought not to detain from him.
Page 324 - And lastly, as to all the rest, residue and remainder of my personal estate, goods and chattels, of what kind and nature soever, I give and bequeath the same to my...
Page 299 - So many and varied are the circumstances to be taken into account in determining the value of property condemned for public purposes, that it is perhaps impossible to formulate a rule to govern its appraisement in all cases. Exceptional circumstances will modify the most carefully guarded rule ; but as a general thing we should say that the compensation to the owner is to be estimated by reference to the uses for which the property is suitable, having regard to the existing business or wants of the...
Page 394 - A husband or wife shall not be compelled, or without consent of the other, if living, allowed, to disclose a confidential communication, made by one to the other, during marriage.
Page 265 - The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed in any manner to affect or impair the title of a purchaser for a valuable consideration, unless it shall appear that such purchaser had previous notice of the fraudulent intent of his immediate grantor, or of the fraud rendering void the title of such grantor.