Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States, Volume 321L.K. Strouse, 1963 - Interstate commerce |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page v
... Tariff Bureau , Inc Ahnapee & W. Ry . Co. v . Abilene & S. Ry . Co -- Akron , C. & Y. R. Co. - American Colloid Co. v Cincinnati , N. O. & T. P. Ry . Co. v Great Lakes Ship Owners Assn . v Louisville & N. R. Co. v v . Atchison , T ...
... Tariff Bureau , Inc Ahnapee & W. Ry . Co. v . Abilene & S. Ry . Co -- Akron , C. & Y. R. Co. - American Colloid Co. v Cincinnati , N. O. & T. P. Ry . Co. v Great Lakes Ship Owners Assn . v Louisville & N. R. Co. v v . Atchison , T ...
Page xiv
... . Co. , 311 I.C.C. 622 545 v . United States , 207 F. Supp . 641 General Tariff Bureau , Inc. , New Furniture - Agreement , 288 I.C.C. 545 578 464 Georgia - v . Pennsylvania R. Co. , 324 U. 321 I.C.C. XIV TABLE OF CASES CITED.
... . Co. , 311 I.C.C. 622 545 v . United States , 207 F. Supp . 641 General Tariff Bureau , Inc. , New Furniture - Agreement , 288 I.C.C. 545 578 464 Georgia - v . Pennsylvania R. Co. , 324 U. 321 I.C.C. XIV TABLE OF CASES CITED.
Page xvii
... Tariff Committee , Inc. - Agreement , 311 I.C.C. 127 ---- 295 10,264 Oil Capital Tariff Bureau , Inc. - Agreement , 294 I.C.C. 781 Oystershells from Mobile , Ala . , to St. Louis , Mo. , 299 I.C.C. 409 Packinghouse Products , Illinois ...
... Tariff Committee , Inc. - Agreement , 311 I.C.C. 127 ---- 295 10,264 Oil Capital Tariff Bureau , Inc. - Agreement , 294 I.C.C. 781 Oystershells from Mobile , Ala . , to St. Louis , Mo. , 299 I.C.C. 409 Packinghouse Products , Illinois ...
Page 4
... tariff . Understandably , then , applicant made no effort to justify the symmetry of its rate structure or the appearance of its tariffs . If applicant's rate structure is archaic , this proceeding is not the proper vehicle for such a ...
... tariff . Understandably , then , applicant made no effort to justify the symmetry of its rate structure or the appearance of its tariffs . If applicant's rate structure is archaic , this proceeding is not the proper vehicle for such a ...
Page 3
... tariff is a mess *** and its rates belie any need for relief from full liability . *** Any relief from full liability should be no greater than that of applicant's competition , principally United Parcel Service . Applicant should ...
... tariff is a mess *** and its rates belie any need for relief from full liability . *** Any relief from full liability should be no greater than that of applicant's competition , principally United Parcel Service . Applicant should ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adjustment appendix applicable assailed rates average Baltimore barge basis Belle Fourche bentonite bureau carload cars Cents Cents Cents charges Chicago class rates Commission COMMISSIONER common carrier competition complainant Complainant's consignee defendants delivery destinations distances divisions docket eastern effective established evidence expenses filed findings freight Fruit Growers Express fully distributed costs grain haul hundredweight Illinois increase Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission intrastate Kansas City load Louis midwestern lines mileage miles minimum weight Mississippi River motor carrier mountain-Pacific movement moving Neilson Ohio Oklahoma operating origins Orleans out-of-pocket costs Pacific percent points Port Newark present commodity rates prior report proceeding proposed rates protestants rail rates Railroad Company ratio reasonable record reduced rates refrigerator cars report and order respondents restated revenue River Seatrain shipments shipper shown Southern tariff Tennessee River Texas tons towing traffic trailer transcontinental transportation truck unlawful unloading western district York
Popular passages
Page 570 - (4) Whenever in any such investigation the Commission, after full hearing finds that any such rate, fare, charge, classification, regulation, or practice causes any undue or unreasonable advantage, preference, or prejudice as between persons or localities in intrastate commerce on the one hand and interstate or foreign commerce...
Page 425 - ... developing, coordinating, and preserving a national transportation system by water, highway, and rail, as well as other means, adequate to meet the needs of the commerce of the United States, of the postal service, and of the national defense. All of the provisions of this act shall be administered and enforced with a view to carrying out the above declaration of policy.
Page 161 - Every common carrier subject to the provisions of this Act shall, according to their respective powers, afford all reasonable, proper, and equal facilities for the interchange of traffic...
Page 273 - ... that notice of this order shall be given to the general public by depositing a copy in the Office of the Secretary of the Commission at Washington, DC, and by filing it with the Director, Office of the Federal Register.
Page 656 - ... to encourage the establishment and maintenance of reasonable charges for transportation services, without unjust discriminations, undue preferences or advantages, or unfair or destructive competitive practices...
Page 161 - ... shall not discriminate in their rates, fares, and charges between connecting lines, or unduly prejudice any connecting line in the distribution of traffic that is not specifically routed by the shipper. As used in this paragraph the term 'connecting line...
Page 390 - August 10, 1956, upon not less than 30 days' notice to this Commission and to the general public by filing and posting in the manner prescribed in section...
Page 467 - Noerr that there may be instances where the alleged conspiracy "is a mere sham to cover what is actually nothing more than an attempt to interfere directly with the business relationships of a competitor and the application of the Sherman Act would be justified.
Page 247 - At a General Session of the Interstate Commerce Commission, held at its office in Washington, DC, on the 19th day of May AD 1914.
Page 428 - Commission to grant on request the right sought is made by the statute to depend upon the facts established and the judgment of that body in the exercise of a sound legal discretion as to whether the request should be granted compatibly with a due consideration of the private and public interests concerned and in view of the preference and discrimination clauses of the second and third sections.