 Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property for public use without just compensation,...  Supreme Court Reporter - Page 345by United States. Supreme Court - 1886Full view - About this book
 | Massachusetts - Massachusetts - 1894
...reasonable rates. See Pennsylvania Railroad v. Miller, 132 US 75. It was also said that '4 Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward ; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property... | |
 | Law - 1890
...that this power of limiiation or regulation is itself withont limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...railroad corporation to carry persons or property withont reward ; neither can it do that which in law amonnts to a taking of private property for public... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1902
...decisions of this court in which it has been held that, under pretense of regulating fares and freights, a any other corporation, partnership, individual, or...commodity, or shall enter into, become a member of, or part da* process of law; that the question of the reasonableness of a rate of charge for transportation... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899
...amounts to a regulation of foreign or interstate commerce, such power Is not without limit; and that, "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...reward, neither can It do that which In law amounts to the taking of private property for public use without just compensation, or without due process of... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1897
...regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the équivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad to carry persons and property without reward. Neither can It do that which, In law, amounts to a taking... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1897
...that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy ; and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1894
...reasonable rates. See Railroad Co. v. Miller, 132 US 75, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34. It was also said that, "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward; neither can it do that which In the law amounts to a taking of private... | |
 | John Norton Pomeroy - Constitutional law - 1886 - 709 pages
...regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot...can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of p.^vate property for public use without just compensation, or without due process of law. Harlan and... | |
 | Chicago and Alton Railroad Company - Railroads - 1886
...that this power of "limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is "not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent...pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not "require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward; "neither can it... | |
| |
