The Solicitors' Journal, Volume 251881 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page 29
... inst . , a question arose as to the extent of the power of examining a judgment debtor " as to whether any and what debts are owing to him , " which is conferred by rule 1 of order 45 . The plaintiffs had recovered judgment against the ...
... inst . , a question arose as to the extent of the power of examining a judgment debtor " as to whether any and what debts are owing to him , " which is conferred by rule 1 of order 45 . The plaintiffs had recovered judgment against the ...
Page 30
... inst . , the question arose whether the court has jurisdiction to order a compromise to be carried into effect as beneficial to infants , when it is opposed by their guardian and by their legal advisers . The action was brought for the ...
... inst . , the question arose whether the court has jurisdiction to order a compromise to be carried into effect as beneficial to infants , when it is opposed by their guardian and by their legal advisers . The action was brought for the ...
Page 34
... inst . , at the Law Institution , Mr. C lyer in the chair . The question for discussion- " Is the construction put upon the Partition Act , 1868 , by the House of Lords in Pitt v . Jones ( L. R. 5 App . Ca. ) , the correct one ? " - was ...
... inst . , at the Law Institution , Mr. C lyer in the chair . The question for discussion- " Is the construction put upon the Partition Act , 1868 , by the House of Lords in Pitt v . Jones ( L. R. 5 App . Ca. ) , the correct one ? " - was ...
Page 48
... inst . the Court of Appeal ( JAMES , COTTON , and LUSH , L.JJ. ) affirmed the decision of Jessel , M.R. , in the case of Kirkham v . Peel ( 28 W. R. 941 ) . The question was whether the defendants , to whom the plaintiff had consigned ...
... inst . the Court of Appeal ( JAMES , COTTON , and LUSH , L.JJ. ) affirmed the decision of Jessel , M.R. , in the case of Kirkham v . Peel ( 28 W. R. 941 ) . The question was whether the defendants , to whom the plaintiff had consigned ...
Page 49
... inst . , the plaintiff , who sued on behalf of himself and all other preference share- holders in the company , claimed a declaration that he was entitled to be paid a dividend in full for the half year ending the 31st of December ...
... inst . , the plaintiff , who sued on behalf of himself and all other preference share- holders in the company , claimed a declaration that he was entitled to be paid a dividend in full for the half year ending the 31st of December ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 at offices action amount app of deft application appointed Bankruptcy bill Birmingham Bristol Builder chambers Chancery Division Chancery lane Charles Cheapside Chester chmbrs claim clerk costs county court Court of Appeal creditors Dealer debtor debts decision defendant Division Edward Farmer Frederick Gazette Gent George Grocer held Henry High Court High st Hotel House Inner Temple inst James JESSEL John Jones Joseph judge judgment Judicature Act King st Kingston-upon-Hull Lancaster Law Society Leeds Leicester Licensed Victualler Lincoln Lincoln's inn fields liquidation Liverpool London Lord Chancellor Lord Justice Malins Manchester matter Merchant Messrs Middle Temple mortgage Newcastle-upon-Tyne Nottingham payment person Pet Dec Pet Jan Pet Nov petition petitioner plaintiff Queen's Bench Queen's Bench Division question Railway registrar Richard Robert rule Smith solicitor Southampton Stafford Thomas tion trial trustee Tuesday V.C. Hall Walsall Wednesday William wits Worcester York