Page images
PDF
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

„ . _ (Fur. cons., d^ms.,

Monda*""19U non wit causes Tuesday....20..General paper. Wednesday. 21.. Motns & Ken pa. Causes and actions in wbich wit. nes*eB are to be examined before the court will be taken on 'l'uesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursday., and causes and actions without witnesses will be taken on Mondays; but when toe list of causal and actions without witnesses is exhausted, causes and actions with witnesses will be taken on Mondays also.

Further Considerations will be taken as part of the General Paper in priority to Original C tuses which have not already appeared in the paper.

Any cause intended to be heard as a short cause must be so marked in the cause-book at least one clear day before the same can be put in the paper to be so heard, and the necessary papers must be left in court with the judge's officer the day before the cause is lo be pat in the paper.

[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

In re The English and French Bank, limd app of the Bank V C B-Aug 25

Taylor v Taylor & 8 E Act, 1877 app of pit from order dismissing petition V C H—Aug 26

In re The Silkstone and Dodwortn Coal and Iron Co limd and Cu'a Aots app of Benjamin Whitwortti Fry, J—Aug 27

In re Wilkinson, deed Wilkinson v Baird app of pit from order on summons to vary Fry, J —Aug 30

Pavey v Pavey app of Ann Pavey and ors V C H—Sept 2

In re Spencer, deed Spencer v Hart app of pit from order allowing demr V C of County Palatine—Sept 6

.-Sullivan v Anthony app of pits Williams J for V C H—Sept 16

Eaton v Hunt app of pit Williams, J for M R—Sept 16

In re The Yarmouth and Oorleston Tramways Co limd app of

HerWt Gonde and ors Cave, J, for M R—Sept 19 In re Wm Levett & Co limd app uf Robert Stonj, a Creditor

Cave, J—Sept 21 <In re Eldridge, deed Hawtin v Wyatt app of deft Kaj, J—

Oct 6

'In re Cbatterton, a Solicitor app of M E Charlton and ore
Kay, J—Oct It

FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION.
For Hearing.
1880.

In re Charles M Roche, gentn. one &o app of Mr Roche from order of Lord Coleridge, L C J, and Mr. Justice Grove— April 27

Ore* nvray & ors v Atkinson & anr app of deft Atkinson from judgt of Baron Huddleston at trial hd Mar 22 by Lord Chancellor and Lords Justices BramweU and Baggallay referred to sp ref for report to this court—restored by order

Wilcockson v Powell app of deft from judgt of Mr Justice Stephen at trial in Middlesex—Apr 14 (security ordered May 18)

Buheel and anr v Curteis app of deft from judgt and discharge of rule nisi by Mr Justioe Denman and Baron Pollock—Apr 14

Cooke and ors v Sbeard app of pits from judgt of Baron Pollock and Mr Jus-ice Stephen on special case—Apr 14

Cuoke and ors v Sheard app of pits from rale nisi for new trial discharged by Justices Denman and Cave and Baron Pollock action tried at Liverpool by Mr Justice Maoisty

Th" Mayor, &c, of Rochdale v The Justices of Lancashire app of pit from judgt of Justices Williams and Mathew on special oaae—Apr 23

xl Young and Co v The Mayor and Corporation of Royal Leamington Spa app of pits from judgt of Justices Williams and Mathew on special case—Apr 26

3T.>ung v The SoDora Co and ors app of pit from judgt of Lord Coleridge, L C J, at trial—Apr 26

"Young v The Sonora Co and ors >pp of pit from rule nisi discharged by Mr Justioe Denman and Baron Pollook— Apr 26

.At orney-G n v Noyes (Q B Revenue Side) app. of Attorney Uen from decree of Mr Justice Grove, Mr Justioe Lindley differing—April 26

Markwink v Redford (deed since action) and ors apD of defta from judgt of Mr Justici Msthnw at trial—April 27

The Manouester and Liverpool District Banking Co Id v Hancook and anr app of pit from judgt of J. P. Murphy, Esq, Q C,at trial— April *8

The Manchester and Liverpool District Banking Co Id v Hanock and anr app of pit from rule nisi discharged by Juttices Grove and Lindley—April 28

De Bernales v The Britannia Home and Colonial Fire Association Id app of deft from judgt of Lord Coleridge, L C J, after ttial in London—Mar 3

Erichsen, representative of London Agency of Great Northern Telegraph Co of Copenhagen v Last (Q B Revenue aide) app of Ericbaen fr mi order of Justioea Lindley, Willia os and Mathew on app case stated by Income Tax Commissioners for City of London—May 10

7he Safety Oil Co limd v Borrowraao, Phillips, and Co app of deft from judgt of Mr Justice Maniety at trial—May 11

Sir Edmd G Hornby, Knt v Cardwell (F B Uanbury third party) app of third party Irom ordtr of Lord Coleridge, L C J, and Mr Justice Field overruling demr—M ly 14

Haywood v The Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society app of defta from judgt of Mr Justioe Stephen after trial at Manchester—May 17

The Yorkshire Fiie and Life Insurance Co. v Clayton (Q B Revenue Side) app of Insurance Co from judgt of Justices Grove and Lindley on case stated by Commrs of Inhabited House Duties for Kingaton-npon-Hull—May 19

The LiW Society of the United Kingdom v Shaw and another app of delta from j udgt of Mr J usiiue Grove at trial in M iddloaex—May 21

The Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Luoas (Q B Revenue Side) app of Lucas from order of Justices Grove and Lindley

on app on case stated by Liverpool Inoomo Tax Coomri —May 23

Hntley v Marshall aop of deft from judgt of Mr Jnttics

Mathew at trial in Middlesex—May 23 Rayne v Keevil app of deft from judgt of Baron Pollock attar

trial—May 26

Fleming v The Mayor &c of Manchester argumtnt of rait nisi for new trial granted by Court of Appeal on application of deft (set down with final appls by order)—May 26

Fleming v Tbe Mayor &c of Manchester app of deft from judgt of Mr Justioe Stephen at trial—May 26

Weat of England and South Wales District Bank v Outlay app of deft from judgt of J ustices Mathew and Cave on special case—May 31

Wainwrlgbt v Wilson app of deft from jndgt of A Willi, Erq, Q C, at trial at Worcester—June 9

The Law So iety v Waterlow and ors app of defta from judgt of Mr Justice Grove at trial in Middlesex June 11

Hallett & Co v Lumsdeu app of pits from judgt of Mr Justice Mathew at trial June 13

Wilkinson and anr v Conlson app of dett Couleon from jalrt of Baron Pollock at trial at Newcastle June 16

The Earl of Dartmouth v Mundy app of deft from jndgt of Justices Field and Stephen on special case Jane 23

The Board of Works of the Hackney District v The Gnat Eastern Ry Co (Q B. Crown side) app of Hackney Board from judgt of Lord Coleridge, L C J, and Mr Justioe Msniatj on app from Inferior Court June 25

Worsley Bros v London, Brighton, and South Coast Ry Co app of pits from judgt of Mr Juatice Field at trial June28

The Queen v Charles Listor (Q B—Crown aide) app of deft from judgt of Baron Huddleetoa and Sir H Hawkins on demr to pless on criminal information June 28

MacGfllivray v West of England Fire and Life Insurance Co, limd app of pit from judgt of Baron Huddleston at trial at Westminster July 1

Laws v Berridge app of pit from judgt of Justices Grots, Lindley, and Stephen, setting aside verdict and judgt.—action tried by Mr Justice Mathew, London, July 2

York Trams Co, limd, v Willows app of deft from jnigt of Mr Justice Mathew at trial at Weetmins'er July 7

Ide and anr v Crichton app of deft from judgt of Bvou Pollook at trial in London—July 7

Suffell v Governor and Co of the Bank of England apt of defta from judgt of Lord Coleridge, L C J, at trial in London —July 16

Whitecrost Wire and Iron Co limd v Savill and ors apt) of defta from j udgt of Baron Pollock at trial in London—July 12

Newton and Co v Sanders Bros app of pits from judgt of Mr

Justice Lopes at trial at Westminster'—July 12 Hill v Sansom and anr app of pit from judgi of Baron Pollock

at trial at Westminster—July 15 Adams v Finch and ors app of Uco Hulme (4th party) from

judgt of Mr Justice Cave at trial at Westminster—Jaly 15 Lathes v Caaeboura and anr app of deft from judgt of Mr

Justice Lopes at trial at Carliale—July 21 Berlin Phosphate Sewage and Manure Co limd v Combs aid

anr app of defts from judgt of Mr Justice Denaiaa at trial

in London—July 21 Harris v Truman, Hanbary and Co app of pltf from Jaiticss

Field, Manisty and Bowen, directing entry of judgt for

deft with costs—July 22 Reffell v Powell app of pltf from judgt of Lord Coleridge,

L C J, at trial at Kingston—July 25 In re George Johnson, Gent, a solr of the Supreme Court sgst

Mary Paine Edwards app of Geo Johnson from order of

Lord Cole>idge, L C J, Biron Pollock and Mr Jatlice

Manisty—Jaly 25 The Prison Commissioners v Clerk of the Peace for Middlesex

app of deft from judgment of Lord Coleridge, L C J, at trial

at Westminster July 26 Austin v Peroivall and anr app of defendant Perclvill from

jadgt of Mr Justice Mathew at trial at Stafford July 26 Saxby and anr v Gloucester Wagon Co, limd app of pita froa

judgt of Lord Coleridge L C J, and Justice* Msniaty, Field,

and Bowen upon findings and report of official referee Jaly

30

Penfold v Pagham Harbour Reclamation Co app of defts from judgt of Mr Justice Lindley at trial at Westminster

Aug 3

Negaa v Forster app of pit from judgt of Baron HaddlesMra *: trial at Westminster Aug 6

Peat (Trustee in liquidation) v Jones and Co app of d fts from Justices Grove and Lindley setting aside verdict and diluting jadgt for the pit, Aug 8

Turner and anr v Fumess Ry Co app of pits from j a lgt of L J Bramwell at trial at Liverpool Aug 10

Ashdown v Ingamslla app of deft from judgt of Sir H Hawkins at trial Aug 12

Rosenberg v Cook app of deft from judgt of Mr Justios Liadley at trial without a jury Aug 16

Cbittick v Harris and anr app of deft Burchell, the younger,

from Justices Grnve and Lindley dismissing app from Mr

Justice Mathew—Aug 18 Johnson v Wilson app of pit from Justices Williams and Cave

dismissing app from Mr Justice Cave setting aside order for

judgment—Sept 19 Gantes Bros. & Co v Leyland & Co and ors app of dfts from

judgt of Mr Justice Field, directg non-suit w costs—Oct 12 •Quilter v Mspleson app of dft from judgt of Lord Coleridge,

L C J at Westminster without a jury—Oct 2t Silcock y Farmer app of dft from judgt of Lord Justice Brara

well at trial—Oot 25

from Orders made on Interlocutory Motions in the Queen's Bench Division.

1881.

Grant v Holland app of pit from rule nisi discharged by Justices Williams & Mathew—April 6 (Appeal dismissed unless Order for Security complied with by Nov 1, 1881)

Mitchell v Mitohell app of pit from judgt 0f Mr Justice Willi »ms on interpleader issue at trial at Liverpool— June 8

£vans v Carte app of deft from rule nisi discharged by Lord

Coleridge L C J, and Mr Justice Bowen—action tried in

Middlesex by Mr Justice Bowan—June 8 Christopher v The United Kingdom Electric Telegraph Co

app of pit from rule nisi discharged by Jast:ces Lopes and

Stephen- June 10 Eddington and anr v Palmer, trustee, &c app of pi's from rule

nisi discharged by Justice) Lopes and Step&en—June 13 May v Head and ors app of pit from order of Baron Pollock

and Mr Justice Stephen dismissing motn to set aside judgt—

June 13

Griffiths v Halloway app of pit from order of Justioes Lopes

and Stephen for new trial—June 14 Griffiths v Steel app of pit from order of Justices Lopes and

Stephen for new trial—June 14 lies, H W v Assessment Committee of West Ham Union and

anr (Q B Crown side) app of W H lies from Baron Huddle

ston and Sir Henry Hawkins—June 15 Smith v Little app of deft from judgt of Mr Justice Mathew

on interpleader issue at trial in London—June 16 Adams v G E Ky Co app of deft from rule nisi discharged by

Justices Grove, Lindley and Lopes—act tried at Liverpool by

Mr Justice Williams—June 2S London & N W and G W Ky Cos v Aman app of pits from ord

of Mr Justice Field on deuir—June 23 Shaw v Earl of Jersey app of pit from ord of Justioes Lopea

and Stephen on sp c—June 23 Fo>de v Swan & ors app of defc Swan from Baron Pollock and

Mr Justice Manisty setting aside order giving leave to defend

—June 25

Clarke v Bradlangh app of deft from ord of Justices Denman

and Williams overruling demr to re-amended claim—June 25 Hart morn t v Foster app of pit from ord of Justices Denman

and Williams as to costs on interpleader issue—June 27 "Wratten v Brown app of pit from Juetices Denman and Williams

refusing to set aside disml w costs—June 29 Solomon v Bit'on app of deft from ord of Justices Grove,

Lindley and Lopes fur new trial—aot tried by Mr Justice Lind

lay—June 29

Bowles v Drake and Co app of defts from order of Baron Pollock and Mr Justice Lindley for new trial action tried by Westmr County Court judge—June 30

The Queen on the prosecution of the Mayor, &o of Sheffield v The Justices of the West Riding of County of York (Q B Crown side) app of defts from rule of Justices Denman and Williams for mauds—July 1

Cbsmberlaine v Barnwell app of pltf from order of Justices Grove, Denman and Lindlev for new trial action tried by Field, J, at Westminster—July 2

Moore v Woolley app of deft from rule nisi discharged by Justioes Grove and Lindley action tried in Middlesex by Lindley, J—July 4

Webber v London, Brighton and South Coast Ry Co app of pltf from order of Lord Coleridge, L C J, Baron Pollock and Justice Manisty for new trial tried in Middlesex by Denman, J—July 4

■Mortensen v Cohen app of deft from rule nisi disoharged by

Lord Coleridge, L C J and Mr Justice Manisty—July 5 Cohen v Hughes app of pit from order of Justices Grove,

Lindley and Lopes, for new trial conditional on payment of

coats of first trial—July 5 fihtffidld & anr v Heath, sued, &o app of deft from judgt of

Mr Justice Lopes upon questions ot law subject to reference—

July 8

In re Arbitration between Mayor, &o of Dudley and Trustees of the late Earl of Dudley app of Mayor, Ao of Dudley from order of Justices Denman and Williams on special case —July 12

Lodgers' Act, 34 & 35 Vict o 70 Morton v Palmer argument

of rule nisi for new trial granted July 20 by Court of Appeal —July 20

Pitman & anr v Universal Marine Insurance Co app of pits from Mr. Justioe Lindley referring to arbitration to ascertain damages—July 23

In re Arbitration between Owen Rice and Robert Rodgers & Co app of O wen Rice from rule nisi (to set aside award) discharged by Mr Justice Grove and Baron Huddleston—July 28

Maisey v McLay (Wilson & ors, claimants) app of pit from Mr Justice Field and Baron Huddleston confirming order of Baron Pollock—Aug 10

China Transpacific Bteam Ship Co limd v Commercial Union Assurance Co app of pltf from order of Justices Grove and Lindley for affidavit as to documents—Aug 10

Goodman v Layborn app of defta from Justioes Grove and Lindley confirming report of Off Ref—Aug 12

Roberts, Judgt Dr v Death, Judgt Cr (Robert Castle garnishee, Mr and Mrs Wells claimants) app of judgt debtor and claimants from Justices Grove and Field confirming order of Mr Justice Mathew—Sept 16

Goodwin v Ashton app of deft from Justices Cave and Kay varying Master's order giving leave to defend—Sept 16

Chambers v The Managers of the Metropolitan Asylums Board app of defts from Justices Cave and Kay restraining (until hearing) reception of patients beyond radius of one mile— Sept 20

FROM PROBATE, DIVORCE, AND ADMIRALTY
DIVISION.
For Hearing.
Admiralty.
1881.

Ship Marina (L'verpool District Registry) C F Cregreen ▼

K Alexander and anr app of defta from judgt of Sir R J

Phillimoro with assessors—Apr 25 Ships Odessa and Murton (oons actns) O wners of the Murton

v Owners of the Odessa Norwood and ors v Owners of the

Murton app of Owners of the Murton from judgt of Sir R J

Phillimoro with assessors—May 3 Ships Gertrude and Carbon (cons actns) Owners of Carbon v

Van Ommeren and ors Dawson and ors v Owners ot Carbon

and freight app of Owners of Gertrude from judgt of Sir R

J Fhillimore with Hs-o -sore—June 8 Ship Amoor and other Vessels Swanston v Lishmin app of

pits from interlocutory order of Sir R J Phillimoro—July 12 Ship Farnley Hall (salvage) Laws, Surtees and Co v Owners

of Farnley Hall app of pits from judgt of Sir R J Phiili

more—Aug 9

Ship Cito 1'ollefsen sen and ors v Owners of Cito, cargo and freight app of Owners of Cito from interlocutory order of Sir R J Phillimore—Aug 10

FROM THE LONDON BANKRUPTCY COURT.
For Judgment.

In re Young Ex parte Young (heard Aug 4

by Lord Chanoellor and Lds Justioes Brett and Cotton) For Hearing. In re Bower Ex parte Briggs

In re Spindler Ex parte Rolph

In re Head Ex parte Nicolson

In re Salisbury Ex parte Banks

In re Mellison and anr Ex parte Dash

In re Latham and Son Ex parte Glegg and ors

In re Eccles Ex parte Heslop

In re Tudner Ex parte W R Banking Co

In re Lawrie Ex parte Lawrie

In re Rees Ex parte Hughes

In re Sadler Ex parte Davies

In re Spencer Ex parte Clare

In re Harris Ex parte Giaves

In re Gardner Ex parte Berridge

In re Morris Ex parte Streeter

In re Hawes Ex parte Sadler

In re King Ex parte Beyfus

In re Moir Ex parte Churoh

N.B.—The above list contains final and interlocutory appeals set down to Tuesday, October 25, inclusive.

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE—CHANCERY DIVISION.
List Of Causes For Michaelmas Sittings, 1881.
Before Vice-Chancellor Bacon.
Causes for Trial.
Rolls v Isaacs act Oliver v Watkins act, witi

Ortnathwaite v The Kingston, Furbsr v King aot, wits
&c, Ry Co act, wits Fuiber v King act, wita

Robs v Fenwick aot, wits Isaacson v Arthur act
Jaokson v Haigh act, wits

Transferred from the M.R., by Order of March 14, 18SI.

Warner v Moses aot, orosa

Starkey v Blank aot wits
Kirkman v Preaoott act wits
Cadman v Draper aot wits (pt

hd)

Niooll v Kenning act wits
C ioke v Woolaros act wita
Barrow v Scammell act witt
Bnnney v Wertoaby *ot wita
Morgan v Miller act wita
Swann v Cheat act wita
Tumour v Owen m f j
Todd v Leaiter act wita
Ryder v Fletcher aot wita

(Sept 20)
Tnllooh v Lambert act &

mfj

In r* Rawlinge Rtwlings v

Phillips act win In ra Booth Brooks v Bounce

u it wits The United P'iria and General

Insuranoe Co v Curtis act,

wita

Perry v William" act Banniuter v Tomkina act, wita

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][graphic][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Brown T Hewens act
Mason v Hibberd act
Whitlock T Whitlook act
In re Hickman Fishier V

Hartill aot
Messenger v M inter act
■James v Blaiberg act
Usill v Whelpton act
Nott T Sands act
Burdelt v Howell aot
Briggs v Mason act
Phillip) v Jones act
Lawrence v Nottingham, &o.

Trams Co act Harris v Putley act In re Baxter Baxter v Baxter

West of England, &o. Bank v

Hankey act & m f j Smith v Meux act In re Phosphate Manure Co.

(ex pte Hsrtmonl) mot Kemp v Bellyse act West of England, tec Bank v

Batchelor act & m f j Southend Marine Palaoe Co. Id.

v Wood aot Kettle well v Watson act &

m f j

Balls v Rowley aot
Stutcbbury v Walker act
Milton v Kemp
In re Brown Tyas y Brown

Hurst y Hurst aot

Speakmui v Speakoaan aot

In re Preston Billaon T Gilbert aot

Roke v Beard -act

In ro Mason Roke v Beard aot

Lander v Linder act

In re Searle Killick v Sey

fang aot Barber v Blaiberg act Beeke v Bouney act Hall y Owen act Wilson v Natl Mercantile Bank

limd act Jones v Davies aot In re Mills Mills y Miller

aot

Parkes v Clemson act Symons v Milkem aot & m f j

Whitehoute v Kerr aot
Parker v Wells aot
Parker v Wells aot
Colrerhouse v lies aot
Wright y Simmons aot
Harier v Colman aot
Penley v Couzens aot
Willis v Walney aot
Burial Board of Kgremont v

Egremont Iron Ore Co Parnell v Waltbam Holy Cross

Local Board act
We'ght v Davie set
Barker y James aot & m i j
Merteus v Davis act
Graves v Bishop act

Gilbert v Bagot aot
Newby v St George aot
-Bennett v Hoare act
Mason v Biggs aot

Causes for Trial (without Witnesses).
And Further Considerations.

Smith T Chadwick act

Coney y Tenaant f 0

In re Blondel Blondel v
Blocdel act & m f j

Frioleau v Haselack f 0

In re Wilson Hunter y Wil-
son act

In re Robinson Robinion v
Robinson not

Longhnret v Carr act

Riddall y Etherington aot &
m f j

Attornev-Oen v Farqabar act
In re Jowliags Jowlings v

Roberts act
In re Lindo Forrestier v

Buddioom ep 0

Before Mr. Justice Kay,
Causes lor trial.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Trauaferred from Mr. Justice Cbitty, pursuant to
Uth September, 1881.

Denman v Crlppa aot, wita
Drum Slate Uaarry Co. v

Spenoe act, wita
Tomkins y Martin act, wita
Vermtnok v Edwards aot,

wita

Thornton v Haley aot, wita

Arden v Griffit i aot, wits

Flachfield v Wetzlar aot, wita

In re Elmsall Blmsall v Edmonds aot, wita

Harwood v Bates aot, wita

Kempson v Bates aot, wita

Hobbs v Midland Ry Co aot, wita

In re Marsden Marsden v

Marsden aot, wita
Nicoll v Evans act, wita
Lewis v Flavar aot, wita
Lake v Hundred of Hoo Ry Co

aot, wits
Blofc v Siuthwold Ry Co aot,

wits

Cole v Powell Powell v Cole

act, wita In re Digby Digby v Digby

aot, wits Learoyd v Tibbetts act, wits Teevan v Teevau aot, wita, &

m f j

Brenner v Sitton act, wita
la re Sharps Sharpe vSharpe

aot, wits
Benham v Irvine aot, wits
In re Bamlett Newman v Al-

cock act, wita Whitehead v Charlesworth

act, wits Lloyd v Arnold aot, wita McUill v Collingridge act,

wits

White v Foat act, wita
In re Sborey Shorey v Jones

act, wits
Whiuker v Baldwin act, wita

Order dated

Thurgood y (

Booth v Rhodes aot, wits
In re Cotterell Woods v

Cotterell aot, wita
Woodin v Evans aot, wits
Nelson v Wood aot, wita
Nye y Bradbury aot, wit
Jones v Owen aot, wits
Muody v Duke of Rutland act
wits

In re Kwing Ewing v Ewing

aot, wita Reynolds, Bros v Williams act wits

In re Martin Howarth v

Smith aot, wita Large v Bradley aot wits Brigga v Deightoa art, wits Richardson v Local Board of

Broadstairs aot, wita Francis v Hayward aot, wita Batchelor v Gilbert act, wita May y Churchill aot, wits Martin v Holland act, wita In re Benson Powers v

Murrey aot, wits Brookfield v Bd of Health for

Worsbrough aot, wita Sm art v Shelton act, wits Moore v Bennett act, w its Pellas v Qerii act, wita Sample v Stahlsomidt aot, wits

In re Kennedy Tyser y Jacknan aot, wits Gibb y Gt Southern Mysore

Gold Mining Co aot, wits Mumby v Downing aot, wita

and m f j Taylor v Tnompson aot, wita Snepar.1 v Jones aot, wits Robarts v Mayor & Commonalty & Citizens of London, aot, wits

Before Mr. Justice Chittt. CauBes for Trial (with witnesses).

L9 Blond v Curtis aot—Dec. 2

Day v Coward aot

In re Calvert, dacd Manners v Baxter act—after Nov 15

Maokie v Nye act

Fothergill v Helmaley act

Lovetus v Newton act (Birmingham)

Maltby v Hodgkinson act

Prince v Bousall Local Bjard of Health act

Price v Smith act

Ewing v Effing Ewing v Hart act

Pearson v Bailey act

Sparrow v Cutis act

Cullum v llobbs act

In re Hobbs, deed. Hobbs v Culluui act

New Sbarleaton Collieries Co. Jmd. v Kinmene act

The Western Brazilian Telegraph Co. v Bibby act & m f j

In re Werderman's Patent Eleotric Ligbt uitn of Werderman against Burgess, Spence and Co, with wits by order

In re Western Distriot Bank adjd sums with wits by order

Eldridge v Davis aot

Kitwood v Worth act & m f j

Johnasaon v Palgrave act

Churobill v Jonnasson act

Moore v Hearn aot

Davis v C jenen act

Smith v Darlow adjd sumns with oro by order

B ennett v Harris

Forwood v Staunton, Tranter & Co act (Lverpool)

Peacock v Sinclair act (Liverpool)

Skipworth v Sayle act

In re Fretwell, deod Bower v Bereaford act & m f j

Hoole v Brown act

Attorney-Gen v Severn Commissioners act (S 0 generally)

West London Permanent Mutual Banetit Bldng Sictety v Planet Building Society act

Holloway v Cheston act
Klinker v Newton act
Hasee' v Jervis act
Nichols v Nicbols act
Herring v Eris Ry Co (1879 —
H—394) aot Herring v
ErieRy Co (1880-H—43)
aot

Vint v Hudspith (1880—V—

046) aot Vint v Hadspith

(1880—V—017) aot Lumb v Mackerejl act Clark V Liebinann aot Vioary v Stroud act Jay v The bag worth Collieries

Co act Carroway y Brisoomb act &

m f j

Moore v Robson Binks r

Moore aot & m f j In re Elliot, deed Hardy v

Elliot act
InreMorant, d«od."Morant v

Manson aot
Thomas v Palin aot
Masson v Saeffiald aot

« PreviousContinue »