« PreviousContinue »
sense above explained—that is, of construction—there this suggested view is to be found in Aspden v. Seddon are only the general principles of the common law to (23 W. R. 580, L. R. 10 Ch. 394) in the judgments of guide us, as such principles are expressed and applied in | Jessel, M.R., and the late Lord Justice Mellish. such like cases as Backhouse v. Bonomi (9 H. L. C. Regarding the other questions proposed in this article, 503); Nicklin v. Williams (10 Ex. 259); and Lamb v. the answer depends more or less in the case of each upon Walker (26 W. R. 775, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 389).
the opinion which may eventually prevail in regard to The general principle is admitted, and will not be the principal question above discussed; but one thing questioned, that in every action the ground of which is appears to be certain, that the right to damages or even injuria cum damno, the damages sustained from the
to compensation is a chose in action so far as regards all injuria as well the future or prospective as the past
damage occasioned prior to the purchase deed ; conand present damages) must be recovered in that action sequently, that such right, so far as regards such once for all, and no subsequent or second action will lie
damage, does not pass to the purchaser as portion of, or in respect of the same injuria for such future or pro.
as incidental to, his land, although of course he may acspective damages, even when they have not been recovered quire the chose in action by special agreement with his in the original action (Clegg v. Dearden, 12 Q. B. 576); vendor, and obtain an express assignment thereof from and this principle was re-affirmed in the decision of him. Lamb v. Walker, by the Queen's Bench Division, in May, 1878 (see also Mayne on Damages, 3rd ed., pp. 84-86; 387-388). It is, however, in the application of this
REVIEWS. principle that the difficulty regarding these refuseheaps, &c., arises. Because, while the original deposit of the refuse is an injuria (at common law) or (what ACTION IN THE COMMON LAW DIVISIONS. is in effect the same thing) a circumstance entitling to PRÉCIS OF AN ACTION AT COMMON LAW, SHOWING AT A compensation for damage (under the title), the difficulty
GLANCE THE PROCEDURE UNDER THE JUDICATURE ACTS is what to think of the continuance of the refuse upon
AND RULES IN AN ACTION IN THE Queen's Bench, the surface-scilicet, is such continuance like a continu.
COMMON PLEAS, AND EXCHEQUER DIVISIONS OF THE ing trespass, a fresh injuria or fresh circumstance in HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. By HERBERT E. Boyle, respect of which (when coupled with the damage flowing Solicitor. Butterworths. therefrom) a fresh cause of action arises ? The judg. ment of the Lord Chief Justice of England in Lamb v.
Mr. Boyle has put into a very short compass the proWalker would be consistent with the view that the con
ceedings in a common law action, and by ingenious tinuance of the refuse was a continuing injuria ; but
arrangements as to type, he brings the various steps very the judgments of the two other judges in that case
clearly before the reader. The book can hardly fail to (Manisty and Mellor, JJ.) would not be consistent with it;
be of service to the student. The Rules of Court appear, although, in fact, none of these judgments contain
from the passages we have examined, to be carefully anything expressly in point, the action having been one
condensed, and occasional references are given to cases. for damage resulting from the withdrawal or diminution
The book appears to us to be executed with more than by one landowner of the adjacent support which his land
| average care. afforded to the land of the plaintiff (a neighbouring landowner). Also, in leases of mines with surface rights, *** We have received another letter from our indethe writer has not unfrequently come across provisions | fatigable correspondent, Mr. W. G. Walker. He appears to by which the annual rent payable for surface taken is abandon all his objections to our review of his book except made to extend to surface not taken under the lease, battwo. (1) He says, “I said [i.e., in his last letter that in taken under any previous lease or leases, so long as such Burdick v. Garrick there was no proof that the person in the land continues (not necessarily to be used as auxiliary to fiduciary position had made interest or profit on the money in the mining operations, but) unrestored; and in all such his hands. It is no refutation of this to say that he made leases it is very usual to insert a covenant to restore the
use of the money. It is common enough for the use of surface, or else to pay the fee-simple value thereof, and
money to result, not in profit, but in logs. Burdick v. in the meantime to continue paying the annual rent.
Garrick says it is not necessary that, in order to charge an
executor with interest on money in his hands, you should On the other hand, no such distinction as that suggested
prove that he has made a profit; it is enough that by the was attempted to be taken (judging from the reports), or
wrongful retainer he might have made one." In this last was successfully taken, in Clegg v. Dearden, where the
sentence Mr. Walker kindly supplies the answer to his act from which the damage flowed was an injuria in former criticism. There being proof that the trustee bad the strict and proper sense of the word ; and regarding used the trust funds, that was tantamount, as regards the the case of Mordue v. Dean, dec., of Durham, where the trustee's liability, to proof that he had made a profit by act from which the damage flowed was one wrongful in them, for where a trustee engaged in trade "makes use " of itself, but under the title whereby the mines and lands
the trust fund, as in Burdick v. Garrick, by paying it into were severed rendered rightful, it is carrying that case too bis own account at his bankers, he is always presumed to far to say either that it is against, or that it is in favour
have made trade profits. As Romilly, M.R., said in Williams of, the distinction we have suggested. Bovill, C.J., does
v. Powell (15 Bjav., at p. 469), “the burden lies on the indeed remark that, with respect to an old pit-shaft
executor to show that, in fact, he has not had benefit in his
trade from this increased balance at his bankers.” We do existing at the date of the conveyance, "no compensa
not know that we need say more on this singularly unimtion could be claimed for its mere continuance in
portant point than thank Mr. Walker for explaining oor excistence"; but then that case also decided that the
meaning. compensation for damage recoverable was to be estimated But (2) Mr. Walker wishes to state that in our review we with reference to the value of the land for any purpose, “suggested, as the source from which he ought to bave been and that the compensation was to include damage by aware of the Indian Act of 1874, only the article in the severance or otherwise, and not merely the value of the SOLICITORS' Journal for 1878." We beg to say that we land actually taken.
did not inake any suggestion whatever in onr review as to Is it possible that the distinction we have suggested
the only source from which Mr. Walker ought to bave
been aware of that Act, but we did suggest in our answer does not hold good in respect of a trespass or other in
to his letter that if he had either read one of the cases he juria strictly and properly so called (Clegg v. Dearden),
cites, or had taken the trouble to look in Lewin on Trusts, but that it does hold good in respect of acts which
he could have found local Indian Acts referred to which (subject to the liability for damage or for compensation) would have given him sufficient warning to enable him, are rightful and not wrongful acts, in respect that they with the help of the chronological table to the Indian Re. are acts flowing out of ownership, or are acts rendered vised Statutes in Lincoln's-ion Library, and of the librarian, right by contract or by grant ? Some corroboration of to discover the Act of 1874. To this suggestion Mr.
Walker has two objections to offer. First, the local Acts (filing) Is. 60. in place of 1s. ; upon request and list of mentioned in Lewin were repealed in 1855. What on earth creditors, say 6d, a creditor instead of 3d.; postage on does it matter? We did not say that Mr. Walker ought to all circulars 1d. instead of 0 d., and so on, as to every have quoted the local repealed Acts, but that the mention of
stamp in fair proportion of increase. these Acts in Lewin might have enabled Mr. Walker to find
3. Assuming the plan I have mentioned to be adopted, his way to the Act in force. Secondly, Mr. Walker
|I think it not too much to say that there would be no says the chronological table of the Indian Statutes
loss occasioned to the revenue. I believe it would be " was not received in Lineoln’s-inn Library till some six or
found to be the reverse. seven weeks after his manuscript had been committed to the press.” This is too absurd. Have matters really come to
4. But the most important of all results would, I feel such a pass that text-book writers are to be excused from persuaded, be achieved. I mean by this that account. trying to find a statute because, forsooth, the chronological ants and trustees' charges would absolutely and entirely table bad not been received at the nearest library? How disappear, and every estate would, as a necessary conlong would it have taken Mr. Walker either to walk to the sequence, gain greatly by the change, while, as to the British Museum Library, or to drop a note on the subject to small additional imposition of stamp duty, I cannot the India Office ?
believe that any estate would seriously feel it. Furthermore, in my judgment, what is called “touting for proxies” would cease, because the inducement to an
accountant to obtain the post of trustee (in some CORRESPONDENCE.
instances a lucrative one) would no longer exist, as irr every case the official accountant would hold that office.
I trust that you will not consider this communication BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION.
too lengthy for insertion. My apology for troubling you [To the Editor of the Solicitors' Journal.] with this letter must be the importance of the subject. Sir, I observe from the Queen's Speech that the
Leicester, Jan. 10.
X. House of Commons will, during the present session, be asked to consider “measures for the further reform of
OPTION TO PURCHASE. the law of bankruptcy." I think it will be at once admitted, that if any system
[To the Editor of the Solicitors' Journal.] could be devised whereby a considerable saving in the Sir,-I read with great interest your recent article on realization of the estates of liquidating debtors or bank the effect of the insertion in a lease of an option to purrupts could probably be effected, the interests of the
chase on the devolution of real estate under the lessor's commercial world must be materially benefited.
will; but it seems to me that the important distinction With this object in view, I venture to offer the follow
which is made when a testator specifically devises or sets ing suggestions :
out in detail his property is not noticed. I gather from 1. In every large town in England and Wales, being a the cases that the effect of this particularising of the local centre possessing bankruptcy jurisdiction, there property would be that it would pass according to the should be established a thoroughly competent official limitations of the will which would have been applicaccountant, with a proper and sufficient staff of assist able to the property in case there had been no sale. If ants, all to be appointed by Government at fair salaries.
this is a wrong assumption I shall be glad to be set The duties of such accountant and assistants to con right. sist:
WM. BARNETT. (a.) Of the preparation of petition, affidavit, request, [We were not referring to the case of a specific de. and list of creditors, &c., on behalf of any debtor desiring vise.-ED. S.J.] to present such petition in person. In cases where the services of a receiver and manager are needed, the Government accountant to fill that position. (6.) In all cases (that is to say, whether the debtor
On Monday week, Lord Gifford, one of the judges employs & solicitor or not) the official accountant to
of the Second Division of the Court of Session in Scotprepare the statement of affairs for the statutory first
land, had a paralytic seizure, which seriously affected his meeting, and to take the trusteeship in the event of
speech. resolutions for liquidation being passed ; to receive and
In the House of Commons, on Tuesday, Sir R. Cross asked distribute composition, if same accepted by the creditors,
the First Lord of the Treasury whether he would take steps and, generally to realize (in liquidation); to declare a
to insure to the House an opportunity of discussing the dividend upon, and to close every estate in the most ex
Order in Council abolishing the offices of Lord Chief Justice peditious manner, and all this free of expense. I would
of the Common Pleas and Lord Chief Baron, recently laid not dispense with a committee of inspection, where
upon the table of the House, before that order should become
law. Mr. Gladstone admitted that this was a grave quesliquidation is resolved upon, but the same relation as now
tion, which had a claim on their consideration when it be. exists to a trustee should be continued as to the official came necessary to deal with it. The order had been on the accountant.
table only four days, and as twenty-five days had yet to (c.) The solicitor filing the petition to register all re elapse before it became law, he hoped the right bon. gentlesolutions passed ; to act as solicitor to the trustee, the man would be so kind as to communicate with him so that committee of inspection, and the estate, and to take all the subject might be discussed at a time that might be con: euch other steps as might be necessary and such as venient, are usual under the Act and Rules now in force. Such In connection with the Bill to consolidate and amend the solicitor to be entitled, as heretofore, to his costs, to be law relating to the property of married women, in relation taxed.
to which a notice was given in the House of Commons by 2. It will at once be asked by those conversant with Mr. Hinde Palmer, Q.C., on the first day of the session, the subject, From what fund is the expense of the deputation waited upon the Lord Chancellor on Tuesday at employment of Government accountants and clerks to be
bis private room in the House of Lords. The deputation defrayed ? My answer is, let the stamp duty payable
consisted of Mr. Jacob Bright, M.P., Mr. Arthur Arnold, upon every petition, affidavit, request, and list of
M.P., and Sir Arthur Hobhouse, and was introduced by Mr. creditors, gazetting, application, summons, ad valorem on
Hinde Paloser. In the course of a prolonged interview, the registration of resolutions, on assets or composition, &c.,
provisions of the proposed measure were discussed. The be slightly increased
Lord Chancellor expressed a desire for the opportunity of that is to say, the scale of fees to
further considering the clauses of the measure, and probe revised to meet and cover the necessary outlay to be mised that he wonld then consult with the promoters of made by the Government-e.g., upon a liquidation the Bill as to its provisions and its progress in Parliapetition, say £1 10s. instead of £1; on an affidavit | ment.
CASES OF THE WEEK.
LAW STUDENTS' JOURNAL.
PRACTICE-OFFICIAL REPEREE-MOTION TO RESCIND
COUNCIL OF LEGAL EDUCATION. DIRECTIONS-Costs. In a case of Underhay v. Smith, before the Master of the Rolls on the 11th inst., a motion was
HILARY EDUCATIONAL TERM, 1881. made by the defendants to rescind certain directions given
Prospectus of the Lectures of the Professors.—The Professor by the official referee as to the mode of ascertaining a loss in of Roman Law will, during tbe ensuing educational term, certain partnership accounts. The question involved the
deliver a course of twelve lectures on the Roman law of construction of the partnership articles, and was of some
persons and family relations considered historically and complexity, and eventually the Master of the Rolls rescinded compared with the English law. The first lecture will be the directions given. The defendants then asked for the delivered on Thursday, January 13, 1881, at 2.30 p.m. costs of the motion, and the plaintiffs submitted that the The subsequent lectures on the above subject will be costs should be made costs in the action, as in effect the delivered on Mondays and Thursdays at the same hour. motion was similar to a summons for the direction of the Equity.-The Professor of Equity will, during the enjadge as to the mode of taking the accounts, and was for the suing educational term, deliver a course of twelve lectures benefit of all parties. JESSEL, M.R., however, held that a upon “the conflict or variance between equity and common question of substance had been decided in the defendants' law, with reference to the same matters." The first lecture favour on appeal from the official referee ; and he therefore will be delivered on Wednesday, January 12, 1881, at · gave the applicants the costs of the motion.-SOLICITORS, 4.15 p.m., and the subsequent lectures at the same hoor Laco, Hussey, f Hulbert; Fladgate, Smith, d: Fladgate. on Fridays and Wednesdays.
Law of Real and Personal Property.—The Professor of
the Law of Real and Personal Property will deliver, daring PRACTICE-LEAVE TO SERVE NOTICE OF MOTION WITH the ensuing educational term, twelve lectures, being “an THE WRIT-POWER OF CHIEF CLERK TO GRANT SAME introductory course on real property law, with special ORDER IN CHAMBERS-DRAWING UP OF ORDER-RULES OF reference to tenures, estates, and the different modes of Court, 1875, ORD. 53, R. 8.-In a case of Conacher v. Con assurance of real property.” acher, also before the Master of the Rolle on the 11th inst.,
NOTE.—This course is intended to be preparatory to a course a motion was made for an injunction, and it appeared that
of lectures on the law of “ vendors and purchasers of real leave to serve short notice of motion had purported to
estate.” have been given by one of the chief clerks by his initialling an informal document applying for the same. An objection
The first lecture will be delivered on Friday, January was taken that the notion could not be brought on, no
| 14, 1881, at 3.5 p.m. The subsequent lectures will be proper leave having in fact, been given, as the chief clerk had
delivered on Taesdays at 4 p.m., and on Fridays at no jurisdiction to give the same. By the notices issued as
3.5 p.m. to the Christmas Vacation it is stated that "applications for
Common Law. The Professor of Common Law will, leave to give short or other special notice of motion may be
during the enguing educational term, deliver twelve lecmade at the chambers of the Vice-Chancellor Malins," and
tures, being the first of three courses of lectures, on the the notices then specify that the brief of counsel in case of
principles of the law of torts. The first lecture will be urgency is to be sent to the judge. It appeared that the chief
delivered on Thursday, January 13, 1881, at 4.15 p.m. clerk's leave had not been drawn up as an order. JESSEL,
The subsequent lectures will be delivered on Mondays and M.R., was of opinion that the matter was entirely irregular, Thursdays at the same bour. and that the chief clerk had no power, under ord. 53, r. 8, Note.-In December next there will be four examinations, to give the leave. The proper way was for the brief of one in the subject of the lectures given by each professor, open counsel to be sent to the judge in the usual way, and for the (subject as hereinafter mentioned) to all students who have during judge to make the order. If the order had been drawn up the year 1881 attended the lectures of any of the professors, but giving the leave, it would then have been a different thing,
no student will be admitted to the examination in the subjects as snch order, though made in chambers, was in form made
of the lectures of any professor unless he shall have attended at by the judge, and no person could go behind the order. As
least two-thirds of the lectures given during the year by such
professor. No student will be admitted to more than two no leave had been given to serve the notice, the motion
examinations; and no student who shall have obtained a must stand over, and no injunction could be granted that
studentship will be admitted to any such examination. day.-SOLICITORS, Laptop ở Jaques : Van Sandau 4: After the examinations the following prizes will, on the reCumming.
commendation of the committee, be given (that is to say):
To the students who shall have passed the best examination in the subjects of the lectures of each professor, first prize, £50;
second prize, £25 ; third prize, £15; fourth prize, $10; and a OBITUARY.
first and second prize of £70 and £30, respectively, to the students who obtain the greatest aggregate number
marks in the examination in the subjects of the lectures given by any two MR. CHARLES DRUCE.
of the professors. Mr. Charles Druce, solicitor (the head of the firm of
No student will be entitled to more than one prize, but a Drace, Sons, & Jackson), of 10, Billiter-square, who was
student will receive the prize of the highest value to which he
shall appear to be entitled. almost the oldest practising solicitor in London, died on the
The committee will not be obliged to recommend any of the (Oth inst., in his eighty-ninth year. Mr. Druce was the son of
above prizes to be awarded, if the result of the examination be Mr. Charles Druce, solicitor, clerk to the Inn-Holders' Com
such, as in their opinion, will not justify such recommendation. pany, and was born in 1792. He was admitted a solicitor in 1814, and bad practised for eixty-six years in Billitersquare. He was formerly in partnership with his father,
UNIVERSITY OF LONDON. and with his brother, Mr. Jobn Druce, and more recently he
1861. was associated with his sons, Mr. Charles Claridge Druce, the
FIRST LL.B. EXAMINATION. vice-president of the Incorporated Law Society for the present
PASS LIST. year, and Mr. Al-xander Claridge Druce, who is now clerk to the Ion-Holders' Company and receiver of Dal
Shaw, Marmaduke Spicer.- Private study.
Mr. ARTHUR CHALLINOR, solicitor, of Hanley, Uttoxeter, Hickman, Walter Richard John.-Private study.
and Burslem, bas been appointed Registrar of the Burslem Hussey-Walsh, Valentine Jobn.-Private tuition.
County Court (Circuit No. 26). Mr. Challinor has been for Stevens, John Edward.-Private study.
some time deputy-registrar of ihe courts lately held at HanStevenson, George Frederick.—Private study.
ley, Burslem, and Tunstall. He was admitted a solicitor in Sugden, Robert Jobn.-Private study.
1875, and is also town clerk and clerk of the peace for the Upjohn, Artbur Ritcbie.- Private study.
borough of Hanley. White, George, B.A.-St. John's, Battersea, and Middle
Mr. HENRY WILLIAU CRIPPS, Q.C., has been elected Temple.
Treasurer of the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple SECOND LL.B. EXAMINATION.
for the present year. First Division.
Sir HARDINGE STANLEY GIFFARD, Q.C., M.P., has been Barrs, Henry Hollier Hood.- Private study.
elected Treasurer of the Honourable Society of the Inner Lawrance, Hamilton Edward.-Private study.
Temple for the present year. Micklem, Nathaniel, B.A.-University College and private
Mr. WILLIAM JAMES HENRY, solicitor (of the firm of Barnstudy.
ham & Henry), of Wellingborough, has been appointed a Napier, Thomas Bateman.- Private study.
Perpetual Commissioner for Northamptonshire for taking the Robinson, Alfred.-Private study.
Acknowledgments of Deeds by Married Women. Upjohn, William Henry.-Gray's Inn.
Mr. GEORGE LEADBETER WINGATE, of 8), Angel-court, Williams, Harry Montague.- Private study.
Throgmorton-street, London, solicitor, has been appointed Second Division.
a Perpetual Commissioner for taking Acknowledgments of
Deeds to be executed by Married Women.
Mr. JOHN EDWARD WILKINS, barrister, has been appointed Cross, William Charles Henry.- Private study.
Secretary to the Royal Commission as to the Laws for the Daphne, Pasco.-Private study,
Measurement of Tonnage. Mr. Wilkins was called to the Oldfield, Herbert Rooke.—Private study.
bar at the Ioner Temple in Hilary Term, 1854, and he is a Pope, Reginald Barrett.—Private study.
member of the Northern Circuit. Sowell, John Thomas Beadsworth.-University College and
private study. Simmons, Samuel Mark, B.A.—Private study.
DISSOLUTIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS. LAW STUDENTS' DEBATING SOCIETY,
WALTER HORNBLOWER and TERTIUS John HADLEY, solici.
tors, 28, Waterloo-street, Birmingham (Hornblower & HadAt the quarterly meeting on January 11, Mr. C. E. | ley). Jan. 1, Barry in the chair, Mr. Arthur James and Mr. W. St.
WILLIAM PERKINS, and FRANCIS HENRY CANDY, solici. Leopards Chubb were elected members of the society. Mr.
tors, 6, Albion-terrace, Southampton (Wm, Perkins & Candy). F. T. Green was elected a member of the committee in the
[Gazette, Jan. 7, 1881.] place of Mr. Spiers, eleoted to the office of reporter. The treasurer laid before the meeting a list of unpaid fines and subscriptions, and the secretary read & statement of the proceedings of the society during the preceding quarter. The remainder of tbe evening was taken up in the disons
COMPANIES. Bion of a motion brought forward by the treasurer for the establisbment of a prize for an essay to be competed for by
WINDING-UP NOTICES. members of the society, but no resolution was come to on the gobject. The following particulars are taken from the
JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. statement of the secretary above referred to. The quarter
LIMITED IN CHANCERY. commenced on the 26th of Ootober and terminated on the
CITY OF BRUNSWICK TRAMWAYS COMPANY, LIMITED, -Petition for
winding up, presented Jan 4, directed to be heard before Bacon. 14th of December, during which time the society beld
V.C., on Jan 16. Terrell, Lombard, st, solicitor for the petitioner eight meetings, one of which was devoted to a debate with ECCLESHILL WORSTED MILL COMPANY LIMITED.-Petition for the United Law Students' Society. Twenty new members winding up, presented Dec 22, directed to be heard before the
M.R. on Jan 22. Paterson and Co, Lincoln's inn fields, agents for were elected, and three members bad resigned. The average
Gardiner and Jeffery, Bradford, solicitors for the petitioners attendance at the meetings was twenty-seven, the highest GRAVESEND AND NORTI FLEET CO-OPERATIVE STORES. LIMITED, nomber at any one meeting being thirty-six, and the Petition for winding up presented Dec 20, directed to be heard
before the M.R. on Jan 15. Crundall and Co, Cannon st, solicitors lowest seventeen. The average number of speakers was
for the petitioners nine, and of voters twenty.
LONDON AERATED AND MIXERAL WATERS COMPANY, LIMITED.
Petition for winding up, presented Jan 6, directed to be heard THE UNITED LAW STUDENTS' SOCIETY.
before the M.R. on Jan 15. Chinery and Co, Fenchurch st, soli
citors for the petitioner A meeting of this society was held at Clement's-inn, on
[Gazette, Jan. 7.] ; Wednesday, the 12th inst., Mr. W. Dowson in the
UNLIMITED IN CHANCERY, chair. After the transaction of private business, the subject PADSTOW TOTAL LOSS AND COLLISION ASSURANCE AssOCIATIOX, of debate was opened by Mr. H. E. M. Donder in the nega
Malins, V.C., has by an order dated Dec 16, appointed Wm Philp:
Bodmin, to be official liquidator. Creditors are required, on or tive, who was supported by Meesrs. Foy, Wade, and Kains
before Feb 10, to send their names and addresses, and the particu. Jackson, and opposed by Messrs. Maclaren, Acland, and lars of their debts and claims to the above. Feb 21 at 12 is apBartrum. The opener replied, and upon a division the pointed for hearing and adjudicating upon the debts and claims
(Gasetle, Jan, 11.) motion on the paper was decided in the negative by a majority of four votes. The subject for debate on Wednes.
FRIENDLY SOCIETIES DISSOLVED. day, the 19th inst., will be : "That this meeting regards BARKSTONE FRIENDLY SOCIETY, Sun Inn, Barkstone, Leicester. with satisfaction the measures proposed by the Government Jan 3 with reference to Ireland.”
FENISCOWLES SUNDAY-SCHOOL SICK SOCIETY, Feniscowles, Lan. caster. Jan 4
[Gazette, Jan. 7.] FRIENDLY SOCIETY, Swan Inn, High st, Stony Stratford. Jan 6.
Gazette, Jan, 11.1 At the Central Criminal Court, on Monday, Mr. James Grayson, a solicitor, was tried on an indictment charging him with having committed wilful and corrupt perjury in affidavits sworn by him in some bankruptcy proceedings. The case eventually broke down, and a formal verdict of acquittal was taken.
REYNOLDS, RICHARD, Leyton, Essex, Coachman. Feb 15. Chester
and Co, Staple inn ROGERS, ALFRED Tuomas, Sutton, Surrey, Painter. Feb 1. Gardiner,
Clement's lane, Lombard st
RUSSELL, WILLIAM, Longstock, Southampton, Farmer. Feb 8. CREDITORS UNDER ESTATES IN CHANCERY.
Garrard and Co, Páll Mall East
SILTZER, JOHN HENRY DAVID, Queen's gate gdns, South Kensington,
Esq. Jan 30. Wordsworth and Co, Threadneedle st BARBER, GEORGE WILLIAM WHITEHEAD, Sclater st, Bethnal Green,
STAUPER, Thomas, Falsgrave, York, Gent. Feb 1. Simpson, New Licensed Victualler. Feb 15. Barber v Barber. V.C. Hall, By
Malton field, Gracechurch st
STUART, DAVID, Tunbridge Wells, Licensed Victualler. Feb 14, BAUNE, PIERRE JOSErH CELESTIx, Canterbury rd, East Brixton.
Cripps and Sons, Tunbridge Wells Feb 14. Piquerez v Baume, V.C. Hall. James, Ely pl. Holborn
STUBINGTON, RICHARD, Weil st, Cripplegate, Shoe Manufacturer BOLTOX, WILLIAM JOHN, Aberdeen, Lieut-Col R.A. Feb 7. Robbins
Feb 1. Wells, Paternoster row v Bolton, V.C. Malins. Robbins, Lincoln's inn fields
TEASDALE, THOMAS, Dufton House, Westmoreland, Gent. Jan BELL. EDWARD SALE, Burland, Eastrington, York, Farmer, Feb
Heelis, Appleby 10. Bell v Bell, V.C. Hall. Rollit, Kingston-upon-Hull
VERNON, Rev. WILLIAM HARDY, Wootton, Bedford. Feb 1. Holt CARTER, ZILLAH, Storrington, Sussex. Feb 1. Bird v Botting, V.C.
and Son, Russell sq. Hall. Mant, Storrington
WAINWRIGHT, WILLIAM, Bardsley, Ashton-under-Lyne, Gardener. CAVALIERO, HENRY LEOPOLD, Minories. Feb 1. Cavaliero y
Jan 19. Toy and Broadbent, Ashton-under-Lyne Cavaliero, V.C. Hall. Carr and Co, Rood lane
WILLIAMS, GEORGE ARTI UR, Cheltenham, Bookseller. July 1, CRAWLEY, THOMAS, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Gent. Jan 31. Lea
Wheeler, Cheltenham v Menton, V.C. Malins. Horton, Birmingham DUNGER, HENRY, Swatham, Norfolk, Gent. Jan 31. Dunger v
[Gazette, Dec. 21. Jones, V.C. Hall. Carew, Southampton st, Bloomsbury
| ATKINSON, ALICE, Felling, Durham. Feb 1. Harle and Co, NewGRIYSDALE, HENRY, Parr st, New North rd, Gent. Jan 26. Grims. castle-on-Tyne dale v Hyland, V.C. Bacon. Lane, Gresham st
BEAVIS, JOHN, Winchester, Builder, Jan 14. Adams and Co, GROOX. ADELAIDE, Guildford st, Russell sq. Jan 28. Groom v Winchester
Groom, V.0. Hall. Durant, Guildhall chmbrs, Basinghall st BLYTH, MATILDA, Colchester, Essex, Feb 22. Howard and Co, HENRY WILLIAX GEORGE, Marquess of Anglesey. Albert mansions, Colchester
Victoria st. Feb 17. Skinner v Marquess of Anglesey, V.C. Hall. BRADBURY, THOMAS SWANWICK, Cheltenham, Gent. Jan 29. Gale, Lowe, Temple gardens
Cheltenham LISTER, JOnx, Sunderland, Ship Owner. Feb 7, Davies v Lister, CLARK, EDWARD, Thornley Colliery, Durham, Butcher. Feb 28. M.R. Bowey, Sunderland
Stokoe, Sunderland MARSLAND, CHARLES, Stockport, Chester. Jan 31. Marsland v COMPTON, CHARLES, Bracknell, Berks, Coach Builder. Jan 30. Thorp, V.C. Malins. Reddish, Stockport
Rooke and Son, Bedford row STAIXTOY, JOHN, Hamilton rd, Islington, Job Master. Jan 25. Evans, JOHN LEWIS, Llandyssal, Cardigan, Corn Merchant. Jan Stainton v Stainton, M.R. Mills, New sg, Lincoln's inn
_31. Williams, Llandilo WEBE, JAMES, Bowmoor, Ilminster, Somerset, Baker. Jan 29. FOGDEN, EDMUND, Appledram, Sussex, Farmer. Feb 3. Sowton, Webb v Webb, V.C. Malins. Baker, Ilminster
Chichester YARDLEY. CHARLES ALBERT. Coburg pl. Bayswater. Blind Manu.
GLOVER, ELIZA, Lower Tooting, Ironmonger. Jan 30. Stoneham facturer. Jan 24. Hudson y Yardley, V.C. Bacon, Andrew,
and Legge, Philpot lane Great James st, Bedford row
GOLDING, WILLIAM, Albany st, Regent's park, Chemist. Feb 3.
TGazette, Dec. 31.] Toller and Sons, Doctors' Commons HANCOCK, FREDERICK, Fenton, Stafford, Beerseller. Jan 31. Han.
HENDERSON, Rev. WILLIAM LAWES, Shepherd's Bush. Feb 1.
Hardisty and Rhodes, Great Marlborough st cock v Hancock, V.C. Hall, Tennant and Co, Hanley
HINTZ, ALEXANDER, Langford pl, St. John's Wood. Feb 7. Hollams [Gazette, Jan. 4.]
and Co, Mincing lane
HUBBLE, WILLIAM, St. Leonard's-on-Sea, Gent. Feb 1. Hicks and CREDITORS UNDER 22 & 23 VICT. CAP. 25.
Arnold, Wellington st. Strand
KETTELWELL, ADAM STUART, Brunswick sq, Camberwell, Shipbroker. LAST DAY OF CLAIM.
Feb 1. Plews and Co, Mark lane
LOCKYER, GEORGE, sen., Deptford, Kent, Chemist. Feb 7. Lockyer, ADDISON, ROBERT, Appleby, Westmoreland, Esq. Jan 17. Heelis,
LOWE, EDWARD WILLIAM DELANCY, Upper Berkeley st, Major-Gen., ARDEX, Colonel WILLIAM, Longcrofts Hall, Yoxall, Stafford. Feb 1. C.B. Feb 1. Taylor and Co, Bedford row Jennings and Co, Burton-on-Trent
MARSHALL, JOHN, Tweedmouth, Beewick-upon-Tweed, Farmer. ATTOUX, ELIZABETH ANNE, Grosvenor rd, Pimlico. Jan 30. Lake
Jan 31. Douglas, Berwick-upon-Tweed and Co, New sg, Lincoln's inn
McWAAN, ROBERT, Tranmere, Cheshire, Gent. Jan 23. Forrest, BATTERHAM, ELIZABETH, King's Lynn. Feb 8. Partridge and Co,
Liverpool King's Lynn
SCARSBROOK, MARY, Deddington, Oxford. Feb 1. Faulkner and BELLAS, Rev. Txomas, Appleby. Jan 15. Heelis, Appleby
Coggins, Deddington BOYALL, RICHARD, Louth, Lincoln, Jeweller. Jan 20. Sharpley SHEPHERD, PHILLIP CAMP, Lower Sutton, Devon, Yeoman. Feb 3. and Son, Louth
Lidstone, Kingsbridge BURRELL, CHARLES JAMES, Newport, Monmouth. Feb 12
SINCLAIR, CHARLOTTE ANN, Balham park rd, Balham. Feb 1. CARTER, LYDIA, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottingham. Feb 28. Maltby, Taylor and Co, Bedford row Manstela
SMITH, WILLIAM CANNON, St. Albans, Hertford, Gent. Jan 17. COCKBURX, Right Hon. Sir ALEXANDER JAMES EDMUND, Hertford st.
Wells, St. Albans Mayfair, Bart, G.C.B. March 1. Ranken-Ford, South sq, Gray's STEPHENS, John, Osborn st, Whitechapel. Botanic Druggist. Jan
31. Lockyer, Deptford COYTETARE, JOIN JAMES, Swansea, Slate Merchant. Feb 1. SWAINE, WILLIAM EDWARD, Guildford. Feb 10. Milne and Co, Donaghue, Swansea
Harcourt bldngs, Temple CRICKETT, GEORGE BODMAN, Ashton-on-Mersey, Chester, Gent. Feb WEST, JULIE ANTOINETTE, Pau, France. Feb 28. Burgoynes and 3. Marlow and Dixon, Manchester
Co, Oxford st Crckson, Thomas, Worksop, Nottingham, Retired Machine Maker.
[Gazette, Dec. 28.] Feb 1. Coulson, Worksop DOEMER, JAMES HARRIS, Leamington Priors, Warwick, Gent. Feb
CARTER, Nancy, All Saints, Southampton. Feb 1. Bassett and Co, 20. Field and Sons, Leamington
Southampton GBAHAY, GEORGE, Sussex gdns, Hyde park, Esq. Feb 10. Neish
CHIPPINDALE, JOIN, Margate, Esq. Feb 1. Hewitt, Nicholas lane and Howell, Watling st
DIECKSTAHL, GEORGE CHARLES, Hanover, Germany, Steel Manufac GRAY, WILLIAM, Eythorne, Kent, Farmer. Feb 28. Claris, Dover
turer. March 25. Broomhead and Co, Sheffield GEIST, WILLIAX, Mare st, Hackney, Confectioner. Feb 5. Harris,
FRYER, JOHN, York, Whitesmith. Jan 12. Cobb, York Moorgate st
GWILLIM, DANIEL,, Beaufort, Brecon, Grocer. Jan 15. Price, GEOVER, DANIEL, Sevenoaks, Builder. Feb 22. Palmer, Tonbridge
Beaufort GWILLIY, DANIEL, Beaufort, Monmouth, Grocer, Jan 15. Price,
HERRING, JAMES, Marton-in-Cleveland, York, Farmer. Feb 17. Beaufort
Dodds and Co, Stockton-on-Tees HARE, ROBERT, Northallerton, York, Bank Agent. Jan 20. Waistell,
HUTCHINGS, HENRY BURDON, Young, New South Wales, Civil Northallerton
Engineer, Jan 31. Piercy and Hutchings, Bournemouth Hodgsox, ROBERT, Westerdale Yarm, York, Farmer. Feb 1. Todd KEEPING, CHARLES, Wirtemburg st, Clapham, Doorkeeper, House and Harrison, Hartlepool
of Lords. Feb 4. Yeilding, Great George st JEWELL, RICHARD GREENWOOD, Harwich, Essex, Hotel Proprietor.
LEES, JAMES, Hope-within-Pendleton, Manchester, Gent. March 1. Feb 1. Russell and Co, Old Jewry
Wood and Co, Manchester LEVI, JOSEPH, Kilbur nPriory, Retired Merchant. Jan 31, Levirton,
LLOYD, THOMAS, Kidderminster, Worcester, Gent. Feb 1. Talbot, Bishopsgate st
Kidderminster LEVI, PH&BE, Whimple st, Plymouth. Jan 31. Levirton, Bishopg
PECK, William, Camden Town, Esq. Feb 28. Shepheard and gate it
Sons, Finsbury circus LLOYD, SARAT, Llandudno, Carnarvon. Feb 7. Minshall and Co,
PUDDY, JOwn, Wembdon, Somerset, Gent. Feb 2. Poole, BridgLlandudno
water Lox, Tuomas, Buckland, Dover, Gent. Feb 28. Claris, Dover
SELBY, ROBERT LUARD, Mote, Ightham, Kent, Major, U.M.'s Army, MARCHANT, MARY ANNA PAOLA GIUSEPPA, Carlton hill, St. John's
Feb 1. Johnsons and Co, Austin Friars Wood. Jan 31. Arnold and Co, Carey st
SMALLEY, WILLIAM, Fleet st, Secretary, Society of Licensed MARSHALL, JOSEPH, West Heslerton Hall, York, Esq. Feb 1.
Victuallers. Jan 31. Child, Doctors' commons Simpson, New Malton
STANFORD, JOIN FREDERICK, North bank, Regent's park, BarristerPaix, STEPHEN MANSER, Hastings, Gent. Feb 28. Claris, Dover
at-law. March 25. Cree and Son, Gray's inn sa PRITCHAND, MATTHEW, Llangattock.juxta-Usk, Monmouth, Yeoman,
WOOD, JOHN, Mexborough, York, Bank Manager. Feb 1. Harrop March 15. Watkins, Pontypool
and Harrop, Swinton PICROFT, AxxA, Reading, Berks. Feb 7. Fortune, Chancery lane
[Gazette, Dec. 31.) READE, Joux Page, Torquay, Esq. Feb 8. Minet and Co, New AYODEO, ALESSANDRO LUIGI, North Shields Shipbroker. March L Broad st
Whitehorn, North Shields