...oath or affirmation and subject to crossexamination. The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law shall not be controlling. The test of admissibility...relevancy, and probative force of the evidence offered. Affidavits may be received in the discretion of the presiding officer if otherwise admissible. Upon...

...urge that the Board received 'remote hearsay' and 'mere rumor.' The statute provides that 'the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling.' The obvious purpose (if this and similar provisions is to freo administrative boards from- the compulsion...

...urge that the Board received "remote hearsay" and "mere rumor." The statute provides that "the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling." The obvious purpose of this and similar provisions is to free administrative boards from the compulsion...

...prevent him from adequately preparing his defense. (4) The provision that in Board hearings "the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling" enables the Board to prosecute an employer on rumor and hearsay only, and violates the Anglo-Saxon...

...urge that the Board received "remote hearsay" and "mere rumor." The statute provides that "the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling." 7 The obvious purpose of this and similar provisions is to free administrative '§ 10(b); 29 USC 160(b)....

...urge that the Board received 'remote hearsay' and 'mere rumor.1 The statute provides that 'the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling.' The obvious purpose of this and similar provisions is to free administrative boards from the compulsion...

...what it regarded as two extremes : the present extreme in the present law which says that the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling, the thing that is in the act now, and the other suggestion that the rules of evidence should be strictly...

...what it regarded as two extremes: the present extreme in the present law which says that the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling, the thing that is in the act now, and the other suggestion that the rules of evidence should be strictly...

...urge that the Board received 'remote hearsay' and *mere rumor'. The statute provides that 'the rule of evidence prevailing In courts of law and equity shall not be controlling'. The obvious purpose of this end and similar provisions Is to free administrative boards from the compulsion...

...urge that the Board received 'remote hearsay' and 'mere rumor'. The statute provides that 'the rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling'. The obvious purpose of this and similar provisions is to free administrative boards from the compulsion...