What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action agreed agreement alleged amount answer appeal applied assignment attachment attorney authority Bank benefit brief building cause charge chattel circuit court cited claim complaint condition contract costs counsel creditors damages debt deed defendant determined direction effect entered error evidence exception executed fact favor finding further garnishee give given granted ground held hold intent interest issue judge judgment jury justice Ketchum land learned liable lien meaning ment mortgage motion named negligence notice opinion original owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession preference premises proceedings proof purchase question reason record recover RES ADJUDICATA respect respondent rule secure Smith statute sufficient taken testimony therein thereof tion town trial trust valid verdict witnesses
Page 188 - States, which declares that no State shall deprive any person of property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Page xxxii - So live, that, when thy summons comes to join The innumerable caravan, which moves To that mysterious realm, where each shall take His chamber in the silent halls of death, Thou go not, like the quarry-slave at night, Scourged to his dungeon, but sustained and soothed By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave, Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams.
Page 189 - ... Undoubtedly where life and liberty are involved, due process requires that there be a regular course of judicial proceedings, which imply that the party to be affected shall have notice and an opportunity to be heard ; so, also, where title or possession of property is involved. But where the taking of property is in the enforcement of a tax, the proceeding is necessarily less formal, and whether notice to him is at all necessary may depend upon the character of the tax, and the manner in which...
Page 382 - The absolute power of alienation shall not be suspended by any limitation or condition whatever, for a longer period than during the continuance of two lives in being at the creation of the estate, except in the single case mentioned in.
Page 189 - ... or persons, or occupations. In such cases the legislature, in authorizing the tax, fixes its amount, and that is the end of the matter. " If the tax be not paid, the property of the delinquent may be sold, and he be thus deprived of his property. Yet there can be no question, that the proceeding is due process of law, as there is no inquiry into the weight of evidence, or other element of a judicial nature, and nothing could be changed by hearing the taxpayer. No right of his is, therefore, invaded.
Page 97 - ... in time after the decree, and not any new proof which might have been used when the decree was made: nevertheless, upon new proof, that is come to light after the decree made, and could not possibly have been used at the time when the decree passed, a bill of review may be grounded by the special license of the court, and not otherwise.
Page 136 - ... must be an animus dedicandi, of which the user by the public is evidence, and no more; and a single act of interruption by the owner is of much more weight, upon a question of intention, than many acts of enjoyment.
Page 315 - The first and great rule in the exposition of wills, to which all other rules must bend, is that the intention of the testator expressed in his will shall prevail, provided it be consistent with the rules of law.
Page 189 - ... due process of law," provided by the State law when a citizen is deprived of his property ; and that, in judging what is "due process of law," respect must be had to the cause and object of the taking, whether under the taxing power, the power of eminent domain, or the power of assessment for local improvements, or none of these : and if found to be suitable or admissible in the special case, it will be adjudged to be
Page 177 - But a mere intruder cannot enter on a person actually seized and eject him, and then question his title or set up an outstanding title in another. The maxim that the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant's, is applicable to all actions for the recovery of property. But if the plaintiff had actual prior possession of the land, this is strong enough to enable him to recover it from a mere trespasser who entered without any title.