Parliamentary Papers, Volume 7H.M. Stationery Office, 1923 - Bills, Legislative |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
... question of fact . Everybody who had a conscious part in the publication would be exposed to the penalty . 99. Everybody who takes a part in it - I should not myself be disposed to allow anybody who was accustomed to publish this kind ...
... question of fact . Everybody who had a conscious part in the publication would be exposed to the penalty . 99. Everybody who takes a part in it - I should not myself be disposed to allow anybody who was accustomed to publish this kind ...
Page 27
... question of whether the actual use by a Judge of words which might be called obscene , only couched in the Judge's terms , are actually injurious to the public , whether he might men- tion a delicate matter which is not usually talked ...
... question of whether the actual use by a Judge of words which might be called obscene , only couched in the Judge's terms , are actually injurious to the public , whether he might men- tion a delicate matter which is not usually talked ...
Page 51
... question there were no specific indecent details , but it was the whole suggestion and in- sinuation of the report which was con- sidered objectionable ? -Yes , I think that is so ; but I think that the ques- tion is whether you are ...
... question there were no specific indecent details , but it was the whole suggestion and in- sinuation of the report which was con- sidered objectionable ? -Yes , I think that is so ; but I think that the ques- tion is whether you are ...
Page 55
... question No. 21 , at page 3. He was asked , " How would you propose to deal with that ? That was the question of publication . He said , " I regard the publication at the present time as an offence against the law ; to publish matter of ...
... question No. 21 , at page 3. He was asked , " How would you propose to deal with that ? That was the question of publication . He said , " I regard the publication at the present time as an offence against the law ; to publish matter of ...
Page 87
... question . As- sume for one moment that the Bill is limited , as you suggest it might be limited to clause 1 ( 1 ) ( b ) , leaving clause 1 ( 1 ) ( a ) out of it ; assume that the Bill prohibited the publication of indecent matter ...
... question . As- sume for one moment that the Bill is limited , as you suggest it might be limited to clause 1 ( 1 ) ( b ) , leaving clause 1 ( 1 ) ( a ) out of it ; assume that the Bill prohibited the publication of indecent matter ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amended and agreed Army Canteen Board Arthur Churchman Bodkin British nationality British subject British woman called evidence CECIL HURST Chairman Clause disallowed Clauses considered Colonel Alexander Colonel Hodge Committee divided Cooper Rawson deal Divorce Court Earl of Desart Expeditionary Force Canteens foreign further examined give heard in support Hugh Morrison husband indecent matter insert the words July June legislation Lieut.-Colonel Nall Lieut.-Colonel Sir Arthur Lord Luke Thompson marriage MEMBERS PRESENT ment naturalisation Navy and Army newspapers obscene offence Office opinion paragraph particular parties person Preamble Pretyman proceedings profits prosecution provision published question Rae Smith recalled and further regard Sir Arthur Churchman Sir Charles Cayzer Sir John Butcher Sir Thomas Bennett SIR THOMAS ROBINSON statement suggest sworn and examined thing tion Wesley Brown wife William Plender William Russell WILLOUGHBY DICKINSON witness woman married